What happens to stars in front of a falling observer entering a black hole?

Passionflower
Messages
1,543
Reaction score
0
It is often said that passing the event horizon for a large black hole is basically a non event as the size of the tidal acceleration at the event horizon depends on the mass of the black hole.

But let's consider something else; what happens to the stars in front of a free falling observer falling radially at escape velocity into a black hole. Can we devise a formula that expresses the red or blue shift as seen by the observer?

We have the redshift formula for stars behind us, which is:
\sqrt { \left| \left( 1-\sqrt {{\frac {r_{{s}}}{r}}} \right) \left( <br /> 1+\sqrt {{\frac {r_{{s}}}{r}}} \right) ^{-1} \right| }{\frac {1}{<br /> \sqrt { \left| 1-{\frac {r_{{s}}}{r}} \right| }}}
Which graphically looks like:
http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/4100/redshift.png
But what do we measure about the stars ahead of us?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the result is:

\lambda_{shift} = \lambda_{0} \sqrt{1 - R_{s}/R_{hover}{}}

Reference: "Black Holes A Traveler's Guide", P.37, Pickover.
 
I don't have "Traveller's guide", but the quoted expression looks like it's for a hovering observer (because of the R_hover).

The black hole itself blocks most of the light from the "other side".

For the falling case, see for instance Andrew Hamilton's webpage, http://casa.colorado.edu/~ajsh/approach.html#lensing.

Picking out the most relevant part of the webpage:

n the illustrated case, the lensing mass is a black hole. Any light rays which come within 1.5 Schwarzschild radii of the black hole fall into the black hole. Here there is a dark region, bounded by the red lines, within which images of background objects cannot appear.

For what you see after you pass through, look a bit later on the webpage, http://casa.colorado.edu/~ajsh/singularity.html, "The Schwarzschild bubble".

I've ommited some things that appear not to be directly relevant to the origianl question that are still interesting, including some interesting discussion about how and when one sees people who have previously fallen through the horizon.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top