What happens to 'unabsorbed' photons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter james_aml
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photons
AI Thread Summary
Photons that do not match the specific energy levels required for electron transitions in atoms are not absorbed and instead interact differently with matter. In solids, the behavior of photons is influenced by collective phenomena like phonons, which affect optical properties. When atoms are under pressure, their absorption spectra can broaden due to the Pauli Exclusion Principle, allowing a range of frequencies to be absorbed. In condensed matter, this leads to energy bands where electromagnetic waves can interact with various frequencies. Understanding these distinctions between atomic and solid-state physics is crucial for grasping how photons behave in different contexts.
james_aml
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

This is probably a basic and therefore stupid question, but hey, I'm new.

When a photon hits an atom, it's energy is 'absorbed' and the electron (if we use hydrogen as an example) jumps up an orbit. It then naturally wants to loose this energy to settle back into it's ground state and subsequently emits a new photon.

My question is two fold...

If the energy absorbed needs to be of a certain discreet amount, then what happens to those photons that aren't of a specific energy? They can't pass through or we would get light pass through all solid objects, but if they're not absorbed and reflected by the process above, what happens to them?

Alternatively, if ALL photons are absorbed (to use a simple term), then given that the newly emitted photon is of a certain quanta of energy (that of the difference between charge shells) then what happens to the difference in energy if the original photon did not match that of the required energy level of a shell jump?

It seems to me (from me ignorant newbie stand point) that the first part of my question is most relevant as I would be more prone to believe that only the photons that are able to produce an electron jump (i.e. those of specific discreet energy) would be absorbed. So what then happens to the 99.9 % of photons that naturally collide with an atom and can't be absorbed and re-emitted?

Forgive me if this is a stupid question. I'm sure this info is all over the internet. Just happens I started here.
 
Science news on Phys.org
james_aml said:
Hi guys,

This is probably a basic and therefore stupid question, but hey, I'm new.

When a photon hits an atom, it's energy is 'absorbed' and the electron (if we use hydrogen as an example) jumps up an orbit. It then naturally wants to loose this energy to settle back into it's ground state and subsequently emits a new photon.

My question is two fold...

If the energy absorbed needs to be of a certain discreet amount, then what happens to those photons that aren't of a specific energy? They can't pass through or we would get light pass through all solid objects, but if they're not absorbed and reflected by the process above, what happens to them?

Alternatively, if ALL photons are absorbed (to use a simple term), then given that the newly emitted photon is of a certain quanta of energy (that of the difference between charge shells) then what happens to the difference in energy if the original photon did not match that of the required energy level of a shell jump?

It seems to me (from me ignorant newbie stand point) that the first part of my question is most relevant as I would be more prone to believe that only the photons that are able to produce an electron jump (i.e. those of specific discreet energy) would be absorbed. So what then happens to the 99.9 % of photons that naturally collide with an atom and can't be absorbed and re-emitted?

Forgive me if this is a stupid question. I'm sure this info is all over the internet. Just happens I started here.

This is where things are confusing, because you are mixing two very different scenarios without realizing it.

You started by describing the scenario of light being absorbed by atoms. Fine. But later, you moved to to solids. Please note that the physics of atoms, individual atoms, is very different than the physics of solids. If you learn nothing else from this, that is something that you should be aware of.

A solid has a lot more going for it. For one thing, there is something called "phonons", i.e. the vibrational modes of atoms that have come together to form the solid. This is a collective phenomenon, and it does not exist with individual atoms. This vibrational modes can be the ones responsible for many properties of the solid, including optical behavior.

I suggest you check the https://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=209 in the General Physics forum, especially the thread on the question of the speed of photon/light in a medium. That should give you a start on getting an idea on optical behavior of light in solids.

Zz.
 
Thanks ZZ,

That's a great start, I'll definitely check it you.
 
There is a big difference between the way solids and single atoms behave. We all learn about the hydrogen atom absorbing single frequencies but even with hydrogen when under great pressure, the spectral absorption lines start to spread so there is a range of frequencies absorbed. This is because of the Pauli Exclusion Principle, which says that two electrons (Fermions) cannot have exactly the same Quantum Numbers. When they are very close together, you need more quantum numbers to describe the available energy levels (all the atoms affect each other too) and the familiar energy levels spread into narrow energy bands.
In condensed matter, the broadened lines become whole bands and so EM waves of any frequency will interact (be absorbed). Solids like glass are an exception, of course, because photons of optical wavelength are not absorbed. But IR and UV are.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top