What happens to wavelength of sound in liquid?

AI Thread Summary
The speed of sound is greater in liquids than in air, leading to a change in wavelength while frequency remains constant for a given object. As the speed of sound increases in a liquid, the wavelength also increases due to the relationship defined by the equation velocity = wavelength x frequency. The molecular explanation for this increased speed involves the bulk modulus, which is higher in liquids due to stronger intermolecular interactions and reduced intermolecular space. Therefore, while frequency stays the same, the increase in speed results in a longer wavelength in liquids. Understanding these principles clarifies how sound behaves differently in various mediums.
hasankamal007
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
We know that speed of sound in liquid is more than in air.
Also, velocity of sound = wavelength X frequency.

Now there's a change in speed of sound from air to liquid, so, wavelength or frequency should have got changed...

But, generally, frequency won't change for an object (correct me if I'm wrong).
So there should be a change in wavelength...
My question is how? The reason?
(Please try to explain also at molecular level)
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You answered your question already. The wavelength increases because the speed of sound increases. I don't see what you mean by explanation at "molecular level" for this.
The wavelength is the distance traveled during the time required for the phase to change by 2pi. Nothing to do with molecules.

If you are looking for an explanation for the increased speed of sound, then you may look at molecular level. The speed is larger in water due to larger bulk modulus (or decreased compressibility). This can be attributed in part to stronger intermolecular interactions and reduced intermolecular space.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top