What happens when the rope goes off hook?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hprog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paradox Rope
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a rope connecting two objects when one object moves away, specifically addressing the implications of classical physics and relativity on the tension in the rope and the point at which it goes off hook. The scope includes theoretical considerations and experimental observations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that when object A moves away, the rope will go off A's hook first due to the tension being applied at A, while B remains unaffected until the tension reaches it.
  • Another participant challenges the assumption that tension is constant throughout the rope, arguing that releasing tension at A does not retroactively stop the wave propagating along the rope, which is a limitation of special relativity.
  • A later reply emphasizes that the experiment of moving one object will show the rope breaking at the moving object, regardless of the speed, suggesting that relativity holds true even at low speeds.
  • One participant questions the interpretation of the experiment, stating that it does not determine which object is in motion but rather which frame of reference the rope is stationary in.
  • Another participant clarifies that if one object is accelerating, it is clear which is stationary, but in a scenario where both objects move away from each other inertially, the determination of which end of the rope lets go depends on the rope's stationary reference frame.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of motion and tension in the rope, with no consensus reached on how to reconcile classical physics with relativity in this scenario. Multiple competing interpretations remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in assumptions about tension in the rope, the effects of acceleration versus uniform motion, and the dependence on reference frames, which remain unresolved.

hprog
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Hi all.
Suppose we have two objects A and B, and suppose we tie a rope R to the objects with the rope R's two edges hooked to a pole or hook on each of the objects.
The rope is loosely connected to the hooks on such a way that as objects will move away from each other, then as the rope will get stretched to the maximum the rope will go off hook as a result of the farther motion.

Now as par classical physics when one of the objects A will move away and the rope will get stretched to its maximum, than the rope will go off A's hook but not off B's hook.
This is due to the fact that since A is the one in motion, and as such the tension to rope is applied at A, and as such the rope is immediately caused to get off hook.
But while the tension is traveling towards B, the rope is no longer tied to A which result in the rope tension being released and as such the rope is not going off hook at B.

This should be true no difference whether A is in accelerated motion or in linear motion, and in either case the rope will go off hook the object in motion and not at the object in rest.

But according to relativity A might claim to be at rest and B in motion, and according to A then the rope should go off at B.
But clearly only one of them can be right (note that if the rope goes off hook at both then both must be wrong!), so clearly one of them will get disproved.
So how does this fit with relativity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hprog said:
But while the tension is traveling towards B, the rope is no longer tied to A which result in the rope tension being released and as such the rope is not going off hook at B.

You seem to be assuming that tension in a rope is always constant throughout the rope. Releasing the tension at A can't cause the wave that has begun propagating down the rope to be retroactively stopped. Constant tension throughout the rope is only an approximation that is valid when the rope has a low mass. If you try to get around this by making the mass of the rope extremely low, the rope will break when you put tension on it. This is not just a practical fact about real ropes but a fundamental limitation arising from special relativity, because the speed at which disturbances propagate along the rope will always be less than c.

-Ben
 
bcrowell said:
You seem to be assuming that tension in a rope is always constant throughout the rope. Releasing the tension at A can't cause the wave that has begun propagating down the rope to be retroactively stopped. Constant tension throughout the rope is only an approximation that is valid when the rope has a low mass. If you try to get around this by making the mass of the rope extremely low, the rope will break when you put tension on it. This is not just a practical fact about real ropes but a fundamental limitation arising from special relativity, because the speed at which disturbances propagate along the rope will always be less than c.

-Ben
Let it be breaking the rope, still this will happen closer to one side according to the laws of physics which we can use to determine the one in motion.
So the problem is still there.
 
Here is an easy experiment that every one can conduct.
Take two objects and tie them with a plastic rope that will be riped off when stretching to much, and start to move one of the objects, you will see that the rope will rip off at the side of the moving object even if the motion is uniform.
(The fact that this experiment is at low speeds should not affect anything, since relativity should hold true at low speeds as well.)
 
The rope is statronary in the frame of reference of A or B. Which is it?

Your experiment does not tell you anything about which is "in motion"; it simply tells you which frame of reference the rope is stationary in.
 
hprog said:
Take two objects and tie them with a plastic rope that will be riped off when stretching to much, and start to move one of the objects, you will see that the rope will rip off at the side of the moving object even if the motion is uniform.

OK. A couple of things here.
1] Starting to move one of the objects means that that object is accelerating. It is easy to tell which object is the accelerating one and which is the stationary one. Relativity has no problem with this.

2] If you change the scenario so that they are moving away from each other inertially then there's no acceleration. In this scenario, it is meaningless to try to determine which one is moving and which one is not, since there is no absolute frame of reference. The question of which end of the rope let's go is determined entirely by whether the rope is statonary wrt A or wrt B.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
46
Views
7K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K