What happens when you remove an excessive amount of electrons.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the theoretical implications of removing electrons from a water molecule using the photoelectric effect, specifically exploring whether this process could lead to the separation of hydrogen and oxygen atoms due to repulsive forces. The conversation touches on concepts from both chemistry and physics, including coulomb explosion and nuclear stability.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that removing electrons from a water molecule could lead to the separation of hydrogen and oxygen due to repulsive forces, a phenomenon referred to as coulomb explosion.
  • One participant requests further elaboration on coulomb explosion, noting that a chemistry major suggested that oxygen might not be recoverable and could undergo nuclear decay.
  • Another participant asserts that nuclear decay is largely unrelated to the electrons surrounding the nucleus and emphasizes that most oxygen nuclei are stable.
  • There is a suggestion that fully ionizing molecules is not a common topic in chemistry, and that such phenomena are more likely encountered in particle physics or high-intensity laser physics.
  • A participant mentions their theoretical approach to research, indicating that the discussion has been beneficial for their inquiries.
  • COLTRIMS is introduced as an analysis technique that utilizes molecular fragmentation to study chemical properties, with some participants expressing interest in this method.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of electron removal, particularly regarding nuclear stability and the relevance of certain concepts to chemistry versus physics. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the broader implications of these processes.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the stability of oxygen nuclei and the conditions under which coulomb explosion occurs are not fully explored. The discussion also highlights the potential for differing expertise between chemistry and physics perspectives.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying molecular physics, chemistry, or anyone exploring the theoretical aspects of electron removal and molecular stability.

Jason White
Messages
44
Reaction score
1
Lets take a simple water molecule for example. You can use the photoelectric effect to remove electrons from a molecule. As a thought experiment, let's say you have a contained single water molecule in a vacuum with no impurities. Perfect Vacuum. If you use the Photoelectric effect and beam specifically wave-legthed photons at it in a succession to remove electrons one after the other, and let's assume that this electron that is removed goes away and never comes back. After removing enough electrons, will the repulsion from the protons in the hydrogens and the oxygen atom cause the hydrogen and oxygen to separate? Or perhaps with other simple compounds as well besides water, i would assume the same process would work to separate elements.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jason White said:
After removing enough electrons, will the repulsion from the protons in the hydrogens and the oxygen atom cause the hydrogen and oxygen to separate?
Yes. This is called coulomb explosion.
 
mfb said:
Yes. This is called coulomb explosion.
Could you please elaborate on this? I asked brother (Chemistry Major (almost, if not 4.0 GPA) in my fraternity) and he said that it could happen (didn't mention Coulomb Explosion) but that the oxygen may not be recoverable since it would undergo (possibly) nuclear decay.
 
The keyword coulomb explosion should give enough material. He should have heard of it, it is a nice tool somewhere between chemistry and physics. If you remove the binding electrons and/or make the components so charged that they repel each other too much, the atoms fly apart.
Nuclear decays have (almost*) nothing to do with the electrons around them. And most oxygen nuclei are stable anyway.*they are relevant for electron capture, but that is irrelevant here
 
16O (99.757% of natural oxygen) is stable. It will not decay.

Perhaps a chemistry major isn't the person to ask about this, I doubt fully ionizing molecules is something that comes up in chemistry too often. You're most likely to come across it in particle accelerators (slam a molecular beam of whatever into a target) or in high intensity laser physics (see for example http://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevA.73.041201 or http://iopscience.iop.org/0953-4075/46/16/164028/pdf/0953-4075_46_16_164028.pdf)
 
mfb said:
The keyword coulomb explosion should give enough material. He should have heard of it, it is a nice tool somewhere between chemistry and physics. If you remove the binding electrons and/or make the components so charged that they repel each other too much, the atoms fly apart.
Nuclear decays have (almost*) nothing to do with the electrons around them. And most oxygen nuclei are stable anyway.*they are relevant for electron capture, but that is irrelevant here
While he didn't mention it, i also didn't reply to him asking if he knew about the phenomenon. So it could be possible that he knew about it but just didn't mention the name of it.
 
e.bar.goum said:
16O (99.757% of natural oxygen) is stable. It will not decay.

Perhaps a chemistry major isn't the person to ask about this, I doubt fully ionizing molecules is something that comes up in chemistry too often. You're most likely to come across it in particle accelerators (slam a molecular beam of whatever into a target) or in high intensity laser physics (see for example http://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevA.73.041201 or http://iopscience.iop.org/0953-4075/46/16/164028/pdf/0953-4075_46_16_164028.pdf)
I am a Physics and MechE major. My questions are purely theoretical to I try and think of new ways to do new things or more efficient ways to do old things. While my idea may not seem relevant to the population, there is still a hidden purpose, within, which I'm not yet willing to reveal. And so far, from this thread the answers I've received have only helped with my research. So thank you, to all! This thread is also linked with my thread about BEC's.
 
COLTRIMS is an analysis technique that uses the fragmentation of molecules to study their chemical properties.
 
mfb said:
COLTRIMS is an analysis technique that uses the fragmentation of molecules to study their chemical properties.

I hadn't heard of COLTRIMS before now (not a molecule person.). That's super neat, thanks mfb!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
Replies
79
Views
10K