What if atoms obeyed an inverse-cubed law

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobsmith76
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms Law
bobsmith76
Messages
336
Reaction score
0
atoms would be impossible in a universe ruled by an inverse-cube law because there would be no stable orbits for electrons.

The above sentence comes from Rees' book Just Six Numbers. I don't get it. Why would an inverse-cube law affect the stability of electron orbits?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because for an inverse-cube potential, there is no ground state!
 
they will obey inverse cube law if universe had 4 space dimensions
 
Bill_K said:
Because for an inverse-cube potential, there is no ground state!

Not to mention flux is no longer conserved. That's a special property of 1/r^2 laws that we often take for granted.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top