What Integers Between -100 and 400 Satisfy Specific Modular Conditions?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integers Interval
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integers within the interval [-100, 400] that satisfy the modular conditions of being congruent to 2 modulo 11 and 3 modulo 13 can be derived using the Chinese Remainder Theorem. The equations to solve are x ≡ 2 (mod 11) and x ≡ 3 (mod 13). The solution yields the integers -75, 68, 211, and 354, which are the valid integers in the specified range.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of modular arithmetic and congruences
  • Familiarity with the Chinese Remainder Theorem
  • Basic algebraic manipulation and equation solving
  • Knowledge of Diophantine equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Chinese Remainder Theorem in detail
  • Learn about Diophantine equations and their applications
  • Practice solving modular arithmetic problems
  • Explore advanced topics in number theory
USEFUL FOR

Students studying number theory, mathematicians working with modular arithmetic, and anyone interested in solving congruences and Diophantine equations.

evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! :)
I am given the following exercise:
Which integers of the interval: $[-100,400]$ have the identity: divided by $11$,the remainder is $2$ and divided by $13$,the remainder is $3$.

It is like that:
$[x]_{11}=[2]_{11} \Rightarrow x \equiv 2(\mod 11) \Rightarrow 11 \mid x-2 \Rightarrow x=11k+2, k \in \mathbb{Z} (*) $
Also, $[x]_{13}=[3]_{13} \Rightarrow x \equiv 3(mod 13) $
$(*) \Rightarrow 11k+2 \equiv 3(\mod 13) \Rightarrow 11k=1 (\mod 13) \Rightarrow [11] [k]=[1] \text{ in } \mathbb{Z}_{13} \Rightarrow [k]=[6] \Rightarrow k \equiv 6(\mod 13) \Rightarrow k=13l+6, l \in \mathbb{Z}$
Then, from the relation $(*)$, $x=11(13l+6)+2$ and we find the values of $x$ from the relation: $-100 \leq x \leq 400$.Instead of doing it like that:
$[x]_{13}=[3]_{13} \Rightarrow x \equiv 3(mod 13) $
$(*) \Rightarrow 11k+2 \equiv 3(\mod 13) \Rightarrow 11k=1 (\mod 13) \Rightarrow [11] [k]=[1] \text{ in } \mathbb{Z}_{13} \Rightarrow [k]=[6] \Rightarrow k \equiv 6(\mod 13) \Rightarrow k=13l+6, l \in \mathbb{Z}$

Could I do it also like that:
$x=3+13l,l \in \mathbb{Z}$,and find also the values of $x$ for which the relation $-100 \leq x \leq 400$ stand and then the solution will be the common $x$s ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
Hello! :)
I am given the following exercise:
Which integers of the interval: $[-100,400]$ have the identity: divided by $11$,the remainder is $2$ and divided by $13$,the remainder is $3$.

It is like that:
$[x]_{11}=[2]_{11} \Rightarrow x \equiv 2(\mod 11) \Rightarrow 11 \mid x-2 \Rightarrow x=11k+2, k \in \mathbb{Z} (*) $
Also, $[x]_{13}=[3]_{13} \Rightarrow x \equiv 3(mod 13) $
$(*) \Rightarrow 11k+2 \equiv 3(\mod 13) \Rightarrow 11k=1 (\mod 13) \Rightarrow [11] [k]=[1] \text{ in } \mathbb{Z}_{13} \Rightarrow [k]=[6] \Rightarrow k \equiv 6(\mod 13) \Rightarrow k=13l+6, l \in \mathbb{Z}$
Then, from the relation $(*)$, $x=11(13l+6)+2$ and we find the values of $x$ from the relation: $-100 \leq x \leq 400$.Instead of doing it like that:
$[x]_{13}=[3]_{13} \Rightarrow x \equiv 3(mod 13) $
$(*) \Rightarrow 11k+2 \equiv 3(\mod 13) \Rightarrow 11k=1 (\mod 13) \Rightarrow [11] [k]=[1] \text{ in } \mathbb{Z}_{13} \Rightarrow [k]=[6] \Rightarrow k \equiv 6(\mod 13) \Rightarrow k=13l+6, l \in \mathbb{Z}$

Could I do it also like that:
$x=3+13l,l \in \mathbb{Z}$,and find also the values of $x$ for which the relation $-100 \leq x \leq 400$ stand and then the solution will be the common $x$s ?

Hi! :o

Yes. You can also do it like that (the second way)... for this problem.

It should be clear that it is a lot more work.
And it only works because the integers have been limited to an interval that is not too big.

Are you perchance working on a chapter titled Chinese Remainder Theorem?

I suspect you will get more problems that are more complicated, so that you will have to do it the first way.
 
I like Serena said:
Hi! :o

Yes. You can also do it like that (the second way)... for this problem.

It should be clear that it is a lot more work.
And it only works because the integers have been limited to an interval that is not too big.

Are you perchance working on a chapter titled Chinese Remainder Theorem?

I suspect you will get more problems that are more complicated, so that you will have to do it the first way.

I understand!Thank you very much! ;)
Yes,I am working on a chapter with this title.. (Nod)
 
evinda said:
Hello! :)
I am given the following exercise:
Which integers of the interval: $[-100,400]$ have the identity: divided by $11$,the remainder is $2$ and divided by $13$,the remainder is $3$.

It is like that:
$[x]_{11}=[2]_{11} \Rightarrow x \equiv 2(\mod 11) \Rightarrow 11 \mid x-2 \Rightarrow x=11k+2, k \in \mathbb{Z} (*) $
Also, $[x]_{13}=[3]_{13} \Rightarrow x \equiv 3(mod 13) $
$(*) \Rightarrow 11k+2 \equiv 3(\mod 13) \Rightarrow 11k=1 (\mod 13) \Rightarrow [11] [k]=[1] \text{ in } \mathbb{Z}_{13} \Rightarrow [k]=[6] \Rightarrow k \equiv 6(\mod 13) \Rightarrow k=13l+6, l \in \mathbb{Z}$
Then, from the relation $(*)$, $x=11(13l+6)+2$ and we find the values of $x$ from the relation: $-100 \leq x \leq 400$.Instead of doing it like that:
$[x]_{13}=[3]_{13} \Rightarrow x \equiv 3(mod 13) $
$(*) \Rightarrow 11k+2 \equiv 3(\mod 13) \Rightarrow 11k=1 (\mod 13) \Rightarrow [11] [k]=[1] \text{ in } \mathbb{Z}_{13} \Rightarrow [k]=[6] \Rightarrow k \equiv 6(\mod 13) \Rightarrow k=13l+6, l \in \mathbb{Z}$

Could I do it also like that:
$x=3+13l,l \in \mathbb{Z}$,and find also the values of $x$ for which the relation $-100 \leq x \leq 400$ stand and then the solution will be the common $x$s ?

The diophantine equation You have to solve is...

$\displaystyle x \equiv 2\ \text{mod}\ 11$

$\displaystyle x \equiv 3\ \text{mod}\ 13\ (1)$

The solving procedure is illustrated in...

http://mathhelpboards.com/number-theory-27/applications-diophantine-equations-6029-post28283.html#post28283

Here is $N = n_{1}\ n_{2} = 143$ so that $N_{1}=13 \implies \lambda_{1} = 13^{- 1} \text{mod}\ 11 = 6$ and $N_{2}=11 \implies \lambda_{2} = 11^{- 1} \text{mod}\ 13 = 6$. The solution is...

$\displaystyle x = (2 \cdot 6 \cdot 13 + 3 \cdot 6 \cdot 11)\ \text{mod}\ 143 = 68\ \text{mod}\ 143\ (2)$

... so that the requested numbers are -75, 68, 211, 354...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Hello, evinda!

I solved it with basic algebra.

Which integers on the interval: [-100,400] have the identity:
divided by 11,the remainder is 2,
and divided by 13,the remainder is 3.
We have: .\begin{Bmatrix}N &=& 11a + 2 & [1] \\ N &=& 13b + 3 & [2]\end{Bmatrix}

Equate [1] and [2]: .11a + 2 \:=\:13b + 3

. . a \:=\:\frac{13b+1}{11} \quad\Rightarrow\quad a \:=\:b + \frac{2b+1}{11}\;\;[3]

Since a is an integer, 2b+1 must be a multiple of 11.

This first happens when b = 5
. . and in general when b = 5+11k.

Sustitute into [3]: .a \:=\: (5+11k) + \frac{2(5+11k) + 1}{11}
. . which simplifies to: .a \:=\:13k+6

Substitute into [1]:
. . N \:=\:11(13k+6) + 2 \quad\Rightarrow\quad N \:=\:143k + 68

For k = 1,2, we have: .N \:=\:211,\,354
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K