What Is a Couple in Engineering Mechanics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pseudo Statistic
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A couple in engineering mechanics consists of two equal, parallel, and oppositely directed forces that create a rotational effect without generating a net force. This concept is distinct from third-law force pairs, which act between two different bodies. When replacing a single force F acting at point P, it can be substituted with an equal force at a different point O and a couple C = r x F, where r is the vector from O to P. This replacement is justified as it maintains the linear effect while accounting for the torque generated by the original force.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with force and torque concepts
  • Knowledge of vector mathematics
  • Experience with Schaum's Outlines: Engineering Mechanics: Statics and Dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of torque in detail
  • Learn about the implications of force application points in mechanics
  • Explore the differences between couples and third-law force pairs
  • Review examples of force and couple applications in real-world engineering scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students of engineering mechanics, educators teaching statics and dynamics, and professionals involved in mechanical design and analysis.

Pseudo Statistic
Messages
391
Reaction score
6
Hey,
I recently got Schaum's Outlines: Enginering Mechanics: Statics and Dynamics and started reading up on it...
Here's what confuses me from the text:
"A couple consists of two forces equal in magnitude and parallel, but oppositely directed."
Would that be similar to saying "A couple is pretty much a third-law force pair"?
That's what I "got" from that sentence, but hey, maybe I'm wrong.
Now, it proceeds to talk about replacing a single force:
"A single force F acting at point P may be replaced by (a) an equal and similarly directed force acting through any point O and (b) a couple C = r x F, where r is the vector from O to P."
Can someone explain why it would be justified to replace a single force by a couple? (Maybe I need a clarification on what a couple actually is)
Thanks a lot for any responses.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The definition given doesn't mention that a couple isn't co-linear - it's not clear from your post whether or not you realize this. A couple (or torque) is like an angular force - instead of acting to accelerate an object in a straight line, it accelerates it rotationally - i.e. starts to turn it about some axis.
 
Pseudo Statistic said:
Here's what confuses me from the text:
"A couple consists of two forces equal in magnitude and parallel, but oppositely directed."
Would that be similar to saying "A couple is pretty much a third-law force pair"?
Absolutely not! While it's true that the two forces comprising a couple are equal and opposite, they act on the same body. Third-law force pairs are always between two different interacting bodies and act along the same line.

Now, it proceeds to talk about replacing a single force:
"A single force F acting at point P may be replaced by (a) an equal and similarly directed force acting through any point O and (b) a couple C = r x F, where r is the vector from O to P."
Can someone explain why it would be justified to replace a single force by a couple?
They are not replacing a force by a couple! They are replacing one force by a second force (equal to the first but acting at a different point) plus a couple.

Realize that an applied force has two effects on an object: a "linear" effect (contributing to the net force on the object) and a "rotational" effect due to whatever torque it generates about some point. The "linear" effect is the same no matter where the force is applied, but the torque generated by a force depends on the point of application.

A couple exerts a torque but no net force. The original force F acting at point P exerts both a linear force (F) on the object plus a torque about point O. Applying the force F at point O would give the same linear force as before, but the torque about O would be zero. So, to properly duplicate the effect of the original force, you must add a couple to represent the torque about O.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
8K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K