What is after QM Core and before QFT?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LostConjugate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Core Qft Qm
LostConjugate
Messages
850
Reaction score
3
I have completed Quantum Core courses as well as GR and it seems there is something I am missing before taking QFT/QED courses. Is there another subject between?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you've taken an undergraduate level QM class, it probably didn't go into as much detail as a graduate level class, so you might want to consider that. But in general, you're all ready to jump into the QFT pool. It will seem like there's stuff you're missing, but that's just because QFT is rather confusing until you understand why you're doing all that...
 
LostConjugate said:
I have completed Quantum Core courses as well as GR and it seems there is something I am missing before taking QFT/QED courses. Is there another subject between?

I don't know what you mean by quantum core, but there are particular chapters (scattering theory is an example) in a what Americans call <graduate> course on QM which are mandatory prerequisites before jumping into quantum field theory, the latter being defined as the formal gathering of facts giving you a description of the Standard Model of Fundamental Particles & Interactions.

General Relativity is not a prerequisite of QFT, only a necessary completion of the classical field theory courses.
 
Last edited:
I found a QFT course that picked up right about where I needed to be. I think the problem was that courses labeled QED were a bit further ahead than I was ready for.
 
LostConjugate said:
I found a QFT course that picked up right about where I needed to be. I think the problem was that courses labeled QED were a bit further ahead than I was ready for.

I don't understand. How could you have had QFT and QED separately and with different levels of difficulty ?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Back
Top