What is an acoustically soft/hard scatterer?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hedzlone
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the numerical solution of acoustic scattering problems, specifically distinguishing between acoustically soft and hard scatterers. A hard scatterer is characterized by a reflection coefficient of 1 and infinite acoustic impedance, while a soft scatterer has a reflection coefficient less than 1 and finite impedance. The boundary conditions for soft scatterers require the total field to vanish at the boundary, whereas for hard scatterers, the normal derivative of the total field must vanish. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately modeling acoustic wave interactions with different materials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of acoustic wave propagation
  • Familiarity with boundary conditions in wave equations
  • Knowledge of acoustic impedance and reflection coefficients
  • Basic principles of numerical methods for solving differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical formulation of boundary conditions for acoustic waves
  • Explore the concept of acoustic impedance in different materials
  • Learn about numerical methods for solving acoustic scattering problems
  • Investigate the properties of absorbing scatterers and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and engineers in acoustics, physicists studying wave interactions, and anyone involved in modeling acoustic scattering phenomena.

Hedzlone
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm currently interested in the numerical solution of acoustic scattering problems. Here, an acoustic wave propagates in a certain medium and hits (at some time) an obstacle. I am then interested in the computation of the scattererd wave. In the papers I read they distinguish between acoustically soft and hard obstacles/scatterers. Mathematically this means that I have to consider different boundary condition but I don't really know what this means physically. What is an example of a soft/hard scatterer?

It would be great if somebody could help me here. Thank you!
 
Science news on Phys.org
Would it have to do with the relative rigidity of the surface? IE: an ideal reflector would be perfectly rigid, with a reflection coefficient of 1 at all frequencies. "softer" surfaces would not be acoustically rigid, and would have a reflection coefficient less than 1 across a frequency range. In other words, the rigid surface would have an infinite acoustic impedance, while the soft surface would have some finite impedance. At the other extreme end (essentially the same as no obstacle), the impedance would be the characteristic impedance of the media (rho * c).
 
Hi,

thank you very much for your answer. It definitely goes in this direction. The soft and the hard scatterer for these problems are both extrem cases (there are also absorbing scatterers which are some kind of mixture).
It now seems to me that both, the soft and the hard scatterer, are some kind of perfect reflectors, i.e. they don't absorb energy but reflect in a different way (depending on the material properties?). I'm not a physicist so maybe this is nonsense, but it cannot be that one is a perfect reflector and the other doesn't reflect at all.
Maybe it helps if I say something about the boundary conditions. For the soft scatterer the total field u_s+u_i has to vanish at the boundary (u_s is the scattered wave, u_i is the incoming wave). For the hard scatterer the normal derivative of the total field vanishs at the boundary.
I found an http://www2.econ.univpm.it/servizi/hpp/recchioni/w2/virt1.htm" which solves this problem in 2D. You can choose the right edge to be a soft resp. a hard scatterer.

Which material combinations could lead to these different types of scattered wave?

Thank you!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
909
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K