What is an integrating factor exactly?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of integrating factors in solving non-homogenous linear ordinary differential equations (ODEs) and their application in converting non-linear ODEs into exact differentials. Participants explore the historical context and reasoning behind the development of integrating factors, suggesting that mathematicians often experimented with functions and their derivatives to discover patterns. This trial-and-error approach led to the realization that manipulating equations could simplify the problem-solving process. The conversation highlights the importance of creativity and pattern recognition in mathematical problem-solving.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Familiarity with linear and non-linear equations
  • Basic knowledge of calculus and derivatives
  • Concept of exact differentials in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the method of integrating factors in solving linear ODEs
  • Study the process of converting non-linear ODEs to exact differentials
  • Explore the historical development of calculus and its impact on differential equations
  • Investigate advanced techniques for manipulating differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of calculus, and anyone interested in the methods of solving ordinary differential equations and the historical context of mathematical concepts.

vktsn0303
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
While solving non-homogenous linear ODEs we make use of the integrating factor to allow us to arrive at a solution of the unknown function. Same applies to non linear ODEs where the ODEs are converted to exact differentials.
But what I don't understand is how and why would someone have come up with the idea of the integrating factor?
How would they have seen the possibility of solving the ODE with the help of an integrating factor?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your question doesn't match the question in your title, but okay, I'll take a guess. I've wondered similar things, and one idea that occurred to me is that someone who really wanted to expand their repertoire in the early days of calculus could simply take lots of functions, find their first couple of derivatives, and then construct differential equations that they satisfy. It would be a slow process but would gradually give one a feel for the shape of some solutions.
Another point is that mathematicians are always hunting for patterns, and might come across an ODE that made them think, "oh, if only there were an x there, it would be a simple product rule!" followed by, "I wonder what would happen if I multiplied the entire equation by x?" Sometimes it is possible to "force a fit"--to contort an equation so that one piece of it looks the way you want, and then see what the rest of it looks like. Essentially, in math, it is easy to take any problem and turn it into a very similar problem with the same answer. So when one is completely lost, one can try random manipulations and see if any of the other forms look easier. If all that's obvious to you already, I apologize. That's all I've got.
 
Cruikshank said:
Your question doesn't match the question in your title, but okay, I'll take a guess. I've wondered similar things, and one idea that occurred to me is that someone who really wanted to expand their repertoire in the early days of calculus could simply take lots of functions, find their first couple of derivatives, and then construct differential equations that they satisfy. It would be a slow process but would gradually give one a feel for the shape of some solutions.
Another point is that mathematicians are always hunting for patterns, and might come across an ODE that made them think, "oh, if only there were an x there, it would be a simple product rule!" followed by, "I wonder what would happen if I multiplied the entire equation by x?" Sometimes it is possible to "force a fit"--to contort an equation so that one piece of it looks the way you want, and then see what the rest of it looks like. Essentially, in math, it is easy to take any problem and turn it into a very similar problem with the same answer. So when one is completely lost, one can try random manipulations and see if any of the other forms look easier. If all that's obvious to you already, I apologize. That's all I've got.
I'm sorry about the question not matching the title. I didn't realize when posting it.
Your guess sounds right. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K