What is atomic concentration and how can it be found for different elements?

y4ku24
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone.

Just a quick question: Could somebody explain to me what atomic concentration is, and whether there is a list of all the atomic concentration of the elements somewhere in the internet.

The 1st time I heard the term, I typed it on wikipedia and google, surprisingly the search did not come out with a straight answer of what it is. Is there another word for it?

Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The atomic concentration of X is the ratio of the number of atoms of X to the total number of atoms. The atomic concentration of any pure element is 100%.
 
  • Like
Likes lain2004
Dear Mapes,

Thank you for your feedback. However, I am reading a paper stating that a Fe90Zr10 alloy has an atomic concentration of Fe: 8.5x10^28 m^-3 and Zr: 4.29x10^28 m^-3

If it is a ratio, why is there a unit, and how did they come up with the estimated values above?
 
y4ku24 said:
Dear Mapes,

Thank you for your feedback. However, I am reading a paper stating that a Fe90Zr10 alloy has an atomic concentration of Fe: 8.5x10^28 m^-3 and Zr: 4.29x10^28 m^-3

If it is a ratio, why is there a unit, and how did they come up with the estimated values above?

OK, this is also a way of reporting concentration. They're dividing the mass density (kg m-3) by the atomic weight (g mol-1) and multiplying by Avogadro's number (6.022 x 1023 atoms mol-1). Does this help?
 
  • Like
Likes lain2004
Yup, very much! thanks again.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top