What is centripetal acceleration?

AI Thread Summary
Centripetal acceleration is essential for maintaining circular motion, as it involves a change in direction of velocity, even if speed remains constant. The formula for centripetal acceleration is ac = (v^2)/R, where v is the tangential velocity and R is the radius of the circular path. An object in circular motion experiences constant acceleration directed towards the center, which is necessary to prevent it from moving in a straight line, as per Newton's first law. The gravitational force acting on an object in orbit also serves as the centripetal force, illustrating the relationship between these two concepts. Understanding these principles clarifies the nature of acceleration in circular motion and the forces involved.
raydred
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble grasping the concept of centripetal acceleration on circular motion.
I understand angular velocity. From there what my books gives me is the centripetal accel formula. ac=(v^2)/R
I don't notice any acceleration in a circular motion. Nothing's accelerating.
What velocity is changing? In what direction? How would I calculate the position of an object by it's centripetal acceleration if:
  • The object has "f" angular velocity.
  • It is at "h" distance from the object it is orbiting.
  • The object it is orbiting around has m mass.

Extra
The first thing I thought was that the centripetal acceleration was the acceleration of the angular velocity. So in a circular motion it would have to be ac=0 or it would disrupt the circle.
But I can't make ac=0 without having either v=0 or R=0. If this was true then the centripetal accel wouldn't be compatible with circular motion.
Then I kept reading in the internet, including in this site, that some regarded it as imaginary. Then I guess thought that maybe it was used to simplify some calculations related to centripetal force for circular motion but it's still blurry in my mind.

Continuing my spoiler's line of though, then again what's the difference between gravitational force and centripetal force?

Edit:I hope this is the right section. I hope I haven't forgot to say something. I hope someone can answer. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't notice any acceleration in a circular motion. Nothing's accelerating.
What velocity is changing? In what direction?
According to Newton's first law, the object would continue in a straight line if there was no acceleration. The velocity change is that which keeps it in a circular path.
 
mathman said:
According to Newton's first law, the object would continue in a straight line if there was no acceleration. The velocity change is that which keeps it in a circular path.

Yes that is true. My thoughts are still blurry as I said so I have trouble asking questions about something which I don't even know what it is.
I understand there has to be an acceleration to keep it a circular orbit. But I'm still confused about the rest of my questions.
Then the gravitational accel would be the same as the centripetal accel?... I think I'm repeating myself but I thought I should reply.
 
raydred said:
I don't notice any acceleration in a circular motion. Nothing's accelerating.
Acceleration means a change in velocity. Since velocity is a vector, that could mean something speeding up, slowing down, or changing direction. In uniform circular motion, the velocity is constantly changing direction towards the center.
 
Last edited:
raydred said:
Continuing my spoiler's line of though, then again what's the difference between gravitational force and centripetal force?
"Centripetal force" is just the name given to the net inward force that must exist in circular motion. To have circular motion, something must provide a centripetal force. In the case of a satellite orbiting a planet (say), the gravitational force provides the centripetal force.
 
Doc Al said:
changing direction
But it must be gradually... yes?
But this and packed with a friend's explanation made me understand the concept I think. Thank you two.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top