What is f(0) if f(x) is a rational number on [0,1]?

  • Thread starter Thread starter victoranderson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rational
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the value of f(0) for a function f(x) defined on the interval [0,1] that takes rational values. Participants explore the implications of continuity and the nature of rational functions within this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants suggest setting f(x) to a constant value, specifically f(x) = 1, and verify if it meets the conditions of the problem. Others question whether this is the only possible function that satisfies the given criteria, prompting a discussion on the uniqueness of such functions.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, considering the implications of continuity and rationality of the function. There is a suggestion to use the Intermediate Value Theorem (IVT) to explore the properties of f, particularly in proving that f must be constant if it only takes rational values.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the need for proof regarding the continuity of constant functions and the implications of the function taking only rational values. Participants are also considering the possibility of contradictions arising from assuming f(0) is not equal to 1.

victoranderson
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
question.png


Please see attached.
The question is to determine f(0).

In my opinion the question wants me to find f(x)..

If f(x)=1, then

1. f:[0,1] -> R is continuous (do I need to prove?)

2. Obviously, f(1) = 1

3. f(x) is a rational number for all xε[0,1]

so f(0) = 1

Am I correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Editing because I think I misunderstood your question in my first reply.

victoranderson said:
View attachment 67599

Please see attached.
The question is to determine f(0).

In my opinion the question wants me to find f(x)..
Yes, that's reasonable. Technically you only need to find ##f(0)##, but enough information is given that you can find ##f(x)## for all ##x \in [0,1]##.

If f(x)=1, then
I take this to mean you want to set ##f(x) = 1## for all ##x \in [0,1]## and verify that it meets the conditions. And it does meet the conditions:

1. f:[0,1] -> R is continuous (do I need to prove?)
Assuming you know that a constant function is continuous, then you don't need to prove it again.

2. Obviously, f(1) = 1

3. f(x) is a rational number for all xε[0,1]

so f(0) = 1
Yes.

However, all you have done is to show that the constant function ##f(x) = 1## satisfies the conditions. Can you prove that it is the ONLY function that meets the conditions? How do I know there isn't some other function with ##f(0) = 0## which works?

Indeed, you can answer this problem without even stating the values of ##f(x)## for ##0 < x < 1##. The key facts you need are that ##f## is continuous and that ##f## takes on only rational values. To do this, suppose that ##f(0) \neq 1## and look for a contradiction. Hint: there's a fundamental theorem about continuous functions that makes this a one-liner.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
jbunniii said:
Editing because I think I misunderstood your question in my first reply.


Yes, that's reasonable. Technically you only need to find ##f(0)##, but enough information is given that you can find ##f(x)## for all ##x \in [0,1]##.


I take this to mean you want to set ##f(x) = 1## for all ##x \in [0,1]## and verify that it meets the conditions. And it does meet the conditions:


Assuming you know that a constant function is continuous, then you don't need to prove it again.


Yes.

However, all you have done is to show that the constant function ##f(x) = 1## satisfies the conditions. Can you prove that it is the ONLY function that meets the conditions? How do I know there isn't some other function with ##f(0) = 0## which works?

Indeed, you can answer this problem without even stating the values of ##f(x)## for ##0 < x < 1##. The key facts you need are that ##f## is continuous and that ##f## takes on only rational values. To do this, suppose that ##f(0) \neq 1## and look for a contradiction. Hint: there's a fundamental theorem about continuous functions that makes this a one-liner.

Thanks a lot.
I think I am done in this question but I really want to know more...

If I prove f(0)=1 by contradiction
which theorem can we use?
I think extreme values theorem , IVT are unrelated..
 
What you need to prove is that if f is continuous and f takes only rational number values for all x in [0, 1], then f is a constant function. Use IVT. If f(a) is NOT equal to f(b) for some a and b in [0,1]) then f takes on all values between f(a) and f(b). That is an interval and any interval contains irrational numbers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K