(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Definition/Summary

Green's function [itex]G\left(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{\xi}\right)[/itex] can be defined thus

[tex]\mathcal{L}G\left(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{\xi}\right) + \delta\left(\mathbf{x} - \mathbf{\xi}\right) = 0\;\;\; \mathbf{x},\mathbf{\xi} \in \mathbb{R}^n[/tex]

Where [itex]\mathcal{L}[/itex] is a linear differential operator, [itex]\mathbf{\xi}[/itex] is an arbitrary point in [itex]\mathbb{R}^n[/itex] and [itex]\delta[/itex] is the Dirac Delta function.

Equations

Extended explanation

The Green's function for a particular linear differential operator [itex]\mathcal{L}[/itex], is an integral kernel that can be used to solve differential equations with appropriate boundary conditions. Given a linear differential equation

[tex]\mathcal{L}u\left(\mathbf{x}\right) = \psi\left(\mathbf{x}\right)\ \ \ \ \ \ \left(*\right)[/tex]

and the Green's function for the linear differential operator [itex]\mathcal{L}[/itex], one can derive an integral representation for the solution [itex]u\left(\mathbf{x}\right)[/itex] as follows:

Consider the definition of Green's function above

[tex]\mathcal{L}G\left(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{\xi}\right) + \delta\left(\mathbf{x} - \mathbf{\xi}\right) = 0 \Leftrightarrow \mathcal{L}G\left(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{\xi}\right) = -\delta\left(\mathbf{x} - \mathbf{\xi}\right)[/tex]

Now multiplying through by [itex]\psi\left(\mathbf{\xi}\right)[/itex] and integrating over some bounded measure space [itex]\Omega[/itex] with respect to [itex]\mathbf{\xi}[/itex]

[tex]-\int_\Omega \delta\left(\mathbf{x} - \mathbf{\xi}\right)\psi\left(\mathbf{\xi}\right) d\mathbf{\xi} = \int_\Omega \mathcal{L}G \left(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{\xi}\right) \psi\left(\mathbf{\xi}\right) d\mathbf{\xi}\hspace{2cm}\left(**\right)[/tex]

Noting that by the properties of the Dirac Delta function

[tex]\int_\Omega \delta\left(\mathbf{x} - \mathbf{\xi}\right)\psi\left(\mathbf{\xi}\right) d\mathbf{\xi} = \psi\left(\mathbf{x}\right)[/tex]

And from (*)

[tex]\int_\Omega \delta\left(\mathbf{x} - \mathbf{\xi}\right)\psi\left(\mathbf{\xi}\right) d\mathbf{\xi} = \mathcal{L}u\left(\mathbf{x}\right)[/tex]

Hence (**) may be rewritten thus

[tex] \mathcal{L}u\left(\mathbf{x}\right) = - \int_\Omega \mathcal{L}G \left(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{\xi}\right) \psi\left(\mathbf{\xi}\right) d\mathbf{\xi}[/tex]

Since [itex]\mathcal{L}[/itex] is a linear differential operator, which does not act on the variable of integration we may write:

[tex]u\left(\mathbf{x}\right) = - \int_\Omega G\left(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{\xi}\right) \psi\left(\mathbf{\xi}\right) d\mathbf{\xi}[/tex]

Hence we have obtained an integral representation for [itex]u\left(x\right)[/itex]. However, to evaluate this integral knowlagde of the explicit form of both [itex]G\left(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{\xi}\right)[/itex] and [itex]\psi\left(\mathbf{\xi}\right)[/itex] are required. Furthermore, even if both [itex]G\left(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{\xi}\right)[/itex] and [itex]\psi\left(\mathbf{\xi}\right)[/itex] are known, the associated integral may not be a trivial exercise. In addition, every linear differential operator does not admit a Green's Function.

It would also be prudent to point out at this point that in general, Green's functions are distributions rather than classical functions.

* This entry is from our old Library feature. If you know who wrote it, please let us know so we can attribute a writer. Thanks!

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# What is Green's function

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Green's function | Date |
---|---|

Understanding operators for Green's function derivation | Feb 16, 2016 |

Regularized Green's function | Feb 8, 2016 |

Color Permutations In Row Of 6 Red, 3 Blue, 3 Green Flower Pots ? | Sep 24, 2014 |

How to use Greens functions to solve variation of Helmholtz equation ? | May 10, 2012 |

Green's, Stokes and Divergence Theorem | May 6, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**