What Is Moment of Inertia in Rotational Motion?

AI Thread Summary
Moment of inertia, or rotational inertia, differs from linear inertia as it depends not only on mass but also on the distance of each mass element from the axis of rotation. This relationship means that calculating moment of inertia involves calculus, taking into account both mass and its distribution. In cases with symmetrical shapes, these calculations can often be simplified into algebraic formulas. Understanding moment of inertia is crucial for analyzing rotational motion and dynamics. Overall, it highlights the complexity of rotational systems compared to linear motion.
westdivo
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
please help me to understand moment of inertia
 
Physics news on Phys.org


With linear motion, the inertia, the tendency to resist being accelerated, is simply the mass. Not so with rotational motion. Rotational inertia (moment of inertia is another name for it) is based on the mass and also how far each bit of mass is from the axis of rotation. So instead of inertia just being mass, it's a calculus expression involving mass and distance. For problems with a lot of symmetry, the calculus simplifies to algebraic formulas.
 


mikelepore said:
With linear motion, the inertia, the tendency to resist being accelerated, is simply the mass. Not so with rotational motion. Rotational inertia (moment of inertia is another name for it) is based on the mass and also how far each bit of mass is from the axis of rotation. So instead of inertia just being mass, it's a calculus expression involving mass and distance. For problems with a lot of symmetry, the calculus simplifies to algebraic formulas.

Thanks
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top