What is Nuclear Engineering all about?

In summary, the conversation is about the importance of understanding quantum mechanics in the field of nuclear engineering. While some may argue that it is not essential, others emphasize its significance in dealing with important effects such as Doppler broadening of absorption resonances. The conversation also touches on the interdisciplinary nature of the field, where individuals with a well-rounded skillset are highly valued.
  • #1
Makveger
17
0
I'm studying Mechanical Engineering (thermo-fluid sciences),and these days I'm reading a book about Nuclear Engineering and it seems very interesting except for some parts that are giving me headaches.

the second chapter is about some modern physics concepts which I am really having some troubles with , like Schrodinger's equation and wavefunction

So is nuclear engineering all about this?

my background about quantum mechanics is ZERO and I didn't revise electric&magnetic fields and electromagnetic radiation since my first year as my study is all about thermodynamics,heat transfer and fluid mechanics

I really like nuclear engineering I can take the trouble to learn this stuff if it's important

So I need to know if it is important and I should fully understand it or I should just read it?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
I don't think I saw the wave equation once in my master's program. Mostly, it was thermodynamics, neutron transport, and a lot of other stuff that is generally handled by computer modeling now.
 
  • #3
Makveger said:
I'm studying Mechanical Engineering (thermo-fluid sciences),and these days I'm reading a book about Nuclear Engineering and it seems very interesting except for some parts that are giving me headaches.

the second chapter is about some modern physics concepts which I am really having some troubles with , like Schrodinger's equation and wavefunction

So is nuclear engineering all about this?

my background about quantum mechanics is ZERO and I didn't revise electric&magnetic fields and electromagnetic radiation since my first year as my study is all about thermodynamics,heat transfer and fluid mechanics

I really like nuclear engineering I can take the trouble to learn this stuff if it's important

So I need to know if it is important and I should fully understand it or I should just read it?

Makvegar,

Yes - to really understand the field, you need to know that stuff. For example, one of the important effects with regard to the safety and stability of a reactor is Doppler broadening of absorption resonances.

As neutrons slow down, when they get to energies in the keV ( kilo or thousand electron-volt ) range the probability of absorption as a function of energy has a bunch of high narrow peaks called resonances. Whether the neutron is parasitically absorbed by the resonance is a function of the neutron energy as seen by the target nucleus which is moving. The higher the temperature of the medium, the higher the velocity of the target nucleus, and the greater the mismatch between the neutron's energy and the energy of the resonance that can be compensated for by the relative motion. The resonance is effectively broadened.

But why does the absorption probability have these high, narrow peaks? That's where the quantum mechanics comes in. Those resonance are quantum mechanical effects due to virtual states in the unbound continuum ( energies corresponding to free neutrons ).

So, if you really want to understand a VERY important effect dealing with reactor control and stability; then you need to understand quantum mechanics and its effects.

Greg
 
  • #4
Morbius said:
Makvegar,

Yes - to really understand the field, you need to know that stuff. For example, one of the important effects with regard to the safety and stability of a reactor is Doppler broadening of absorption resonances.

As neutrons slow down, when they get to energies in the keV ( kilo or thousand electron-volt ) range the probability of absorption as a function of energy has a bunch of high narrow peaks called resonances. Whether the neutron is parasitically absorbed by the resonance is a function of the neutron energy as seen by the target nucleus which is moving. The higher the temperature of the medium, the higher the velocity of the target nucleus, and the greater the mismatch between the neutron's energy and the energy of the resonance that can be compensated for by the relative motion. The resonance is effectively broadened.

But why does the absorption probability have these high, narrow peaks? That's where the quantum mechanics comes in. Those resonance are quantum mechanical effects due to virtual states in the unbound continuum ( energies corresponding to free neutrons ).

So, if you really want to understand a VERY important effect dealing with reactor control and stability; then you need to understand quantum mechanics and its effects.

Greg

On the other hand, Thermal Hydraulics and Safety Analysis can be view outside that context.

If you are interested in the thermal fluids side of things, I would highly encourage a career geared towards it.
 
  • #5
Thanks guys for your replies but I am kind of confused right now

Morbius :
So, if you really want to understand a VERY important effect dealing with reactor control and stability; then you need to understand quantum mechanics and its effects.

daveb :
I don't think I saw the wave equation once in my master's program. Mostly, it was thermodynamics, neutron transport, and a lot of other stuff that is generally handled by computer modeling now.

so :biggrin: ?

@Moribus : Can you please mention the topics of Modern Physics that is essential for nuclear engineering?
 
  • #6
Mac:



Here's my story:
We got exposed to Schrodinger in third semester physics, sophomore year. Frankly that pushed my intellectual limit.

I was into electronics and like you became interested in the reactor. Chart of the Nuclides was just a wonderland.

So i asked my advisor to let me take a course in Reactor Physics as a senior year elective.
After graduation i went to work in a nuclear plant maintaining the electronic instruments.
To my surprise i found myself doing a lot of inerpreting between disciplines - pure electrical and pure mechanical engineers had no familiarity with reactors and pure nuclear engineers had no familiarity with electronics or three phase power. I developed a profound respect for Navy Nukes because they were far better rounded than most engineers, at least in the late sixties.

The industry needs high-powered abstract thinkers for office work.
The industry needs people with that knack for machinery for field work.
The industry needs people with in-between skills who can be translators.

I might have made a mediocre professor. But i was a darn good technician, and helped lots of other folks with the basics..

a power plant is a maze of mechanical and electrical equipment wrapped around a simple thermal reactor. You can have the best of both worlds. If you're the type who changes his own sparkplugs, consider plant maintenance.

old jim
 
  • #7
jim hardy said:
Mac:



Here's my story:
We got exposed to Schrodinger in third semester physics, sophomore year. Frankly that pushed my intellectual limit.

I was into electronics and like you became interested in the reactor. Chart of the Nuclides was just a wonderland.

So i asked my advisor to let me take a course in Reactor Physics as a senior year elective.
After graduation i went to work in a nuclear plant maintaining the electronic instruments.
To my surprise i found myself doing a lot of inerpreting between disciplines - pure electrical and pure mechanical engineers had no familiarity with reactors and pure nuclear engineers had no familiarity with electronics or three phase power. I developed a profound respect for Navy Nukes because they were far better rounded than most engineers, at least in the late sixties.

The industry needs high-powered abstract thinkers for office work.
The industry needs people with that knack for machinery for field work.
The industry needs people with in-between skills who can be translators.

I might have made a mediocre professor. But i was a darn good technician, and helped lots of other folks with the basics..

a power plant is a maze of mechanical and electrical equipment wrapped around a simple thermal reactor. You can have the best of both worlds. If you're the type who changes his own sparkplugs, consider plant maintenance.

old jim

I strongly believe you'd been a better professor than anyone else I have ever had in Nuclear.
 
  • #8
?

well, thank you Mr C-I... what a kind thing to say...

The measure of a man's bigness is how he treats little people. You measure up big, my friend !

old jim
 
Last edited:
  • #9
jim hardy said:
Mac:

The industry needs high-powered abstract thinkers for office work.
The industry needs people with that knack for machinery for field work.
The industry needs people with in-between skills who can be translators.

I might have made a mediocre professor. But i was a darn good technician, and helped lots of other folks with the basics..

old jim

I wish I had a professor like you
 
  • #10
Makveger said:
Thanks guys for your replies but I am kind of confused right now

Morbius :
So, if you really want to understand a VERY important effect dealing with reactor control and stability; then you need to understand quantum mechanics and its effects.

daveb :
I don't think I saw the wave equation once in my master's program. Mostly, it was thermodynamics, neutron transport, and a lot of other stuff that is generally handled by computer modeling now.

so :biggrin: ?

@Moribus : Can you please mention the topics of Modern Physics that is essential for nuclear engineering?
Quantum mechanics and 'modern' physics are required where one develops the microscopic cross-sections for various radionuclides from which one constructs macroscopic cross-sections used in transport theory and core simulators. Reactor physics is a mature field, but there is always room for improvement.

Nuclear energy is a multi-discipline field. Besides nuclear engineering, there is a need for mechanical engineers, electrical/electronics engineers, civil/structural engineers, materials engineers, . . . . And they (should) work as a team.

Engineering is applied physics afterall, and the more physics and mathematics one knows the better - in my opinion and experience. There are jobs in nuclear engineering that do not require intimate knowledge of nuclear physics, but without that knowledge, one will be limited to jobs that do not require such knowledge. Any engineer should seek to be well-rounded (diviersified) as much as possible.

A major developing area is multi-scale computational physics. Computational systems are being developed to do simulations of nuclear fuel, fuel assemblies, reactor (core and cooling system), and plant. Because of the nature of the discharged fuel, post-irradiation behavior is also the subject of advanced modeling and simuation. Multi-scale simulation involves modeling the physics at the atomic level in order to develop better meso-scale and engineering scale models, which are then used to simulate and predict the behavior of nuclear systems under normal (primarily steady-state) conditions and off-normal events. The challenge then is to consider off-normal events, e.g., transient boundary conditions, including natural events such as earthquakes, floods, fires, hurricanes/tornadoes, as well as human initiated events.
 
  • #11
Astronuc said:
Quantum mechanics and 'modern' physics are required where one develops the microscopic cross-sections for various radionuclides from which one constructs macroscopic cross-sections used in transport theory and core simulators. Reactor physics is a mature field, but there is always room for improvement.

Nuclear energy is a multi-discipline field. Besides nuclear engineering, there is a need for mechanical engineers, electrical/electronics engineers, civil/structural engineers, materials engineers, . . . . And they (should) work as a team...

Amen to all that Astronuc has said. I couldn't say it better.

I'm always troubled when someone asks "Do I really need to know..."

It's like one is looking for the minimum amount of knowledge and schooling that one can
"get away with".

It's not about looking for what you can "get away with" - the more you know, the better - in ALL fields.

Greg
 
  • #12
Thanks Astronuc , that's what I needed to know :)

Morbius
Actually I'm not, you see I am a mechanical engineer and I am studying nuclear engineering how is that not knowing more?
I was just asking for the guidelines as it's the first time for me to explore such world
 

Related to What is Nuclear Engineering all about?

1. What is nuclear engineering?

Nuclear engineering is a branch of engineering that deals with the application of nuclear processes in various fields, such as energy production, medicine, and space exploration. It involves the study of nuclear reactions, radiation, and the design and maintenance of nuclear power plants and other nuclear facilities.

2. What is the difference between nuclear engineering and other branches of engineering?

Nuclear engineering differs from other branches of engineering in that it focuses on the use of nuclear energy and radiation. Other branches of engineering, such as mechanical or electrical engineering, may also involve nuclear applications, but they are not the main focus.

3. What are the career opportunities for nuclear engineers?

Nuclear engineers can work in a variety of industries, including energy production, nuclear medicine, and research and development. They may also work in government agencies, such as the Department of Energy or the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

4. What skills are needed to become a nuclear engineer?

To become a nuclear engineer, one needs a strong background in mathematics, physics, and chemistry. Critical thinking, problem-solving, and analytical skills are also essential. In addition, knowledge of nuclear technology and safety regulations is crucial for this field.

5. Is nuclear engineering a safe field to work in?

Yes, nuclear engineering is a safe field to work in, as long as proper safety regulations and protocols are followed. Nuclear engineers are trained to prioritize safety and ensure that nuclear processes and facilities are operated and maintained safely. Regular safety checks and inspections are also conducted to ensure the safety of workers and the public.

Similar threads

  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
13
Views
885
Replies
1
Views
200
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
3
Views
914
Back
Top