What Is Pluto? Can We Live There?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FreeWill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pluto
AI Thread Summary
Pluto is a unique celestial body that defies traditional classifications of planets, being neither a terrestrial nor a gas giant, and is believed to be composed mainly of ices rather than rock. The discussion highlights that living on Pluto is unlikely due to its low density and harsh conditions, including a freezing atmosphere that can fall as snow. There is ongoing debate about whether Pluto should still be classified as a planet, with some suggesting it resembles a large comet or asteroid. Additionally, the relationship between Pluto and its moon Charon is noted, particularly their shared atmosphere, which only exists when not frozen. Overall, Pluto's classification and characteristics continue to spark interest and debate within the scientific community.
FreeWill
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
What exactly is Pluto? It says "Pluto is the only known planet which cannot be placed in the terrestrial versus gas-giant planet classification -- it is small, but not very dense." What does that mean? We couldn't live on gas planets because there's no surface there right? But could we live on Pluto? How much do we know about Pluto?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
moved :smile:
 
FreeWill said:
What exactly is Pluto? It says "Pluto is the only known planet which cannot be placed in the terrestrial versus gas-giant planet classification -- it is small, but not very dense." What does that mean? We couldn't live on gas planets because there's no surface there right? But could we live on Pluto? How much do we know about Pluto?

What this means is that the terrestrial planets, are small and dense because they are mostly made form rock. The low density of Pluto suggests that it contains little or no rock and just might be composed of various ices. There is some argument that Pluto shouldn't even be considered a planet at all but is just the largest member of the Kuiper belt, which consists of like icey bodies.
 
on wikipedia it says that it and Charon, it's sattalite, share the same atmosphere, and sometimes the atmosphere will freeze and it will form a single icy body
 
It's very evident that Pluto is not akin to any other of the 8 other planets, so I prefer to call it a minor planet

I also think that is probable that in the future some object bigger than Pluto will be found in the Kuiper Belt (Sedna and Quaoar have been close to the mark)
 
hexhunter said:
...and sometimes the atmosphere will freeze and it will form a single icy body

Er..What? No, this isn't correct. I think you must have read it wrong
 
Hexhunter said:
on wikipedia it says that it and Charon, it's sattalite, share the same atmosphere, and sometimes the atmosphere will freeze and it will form a single icy body.
Adrian Baker said:
Er..What? No, this isn't correct. I think you must have read it wrong
I got to say, that's the weirdest thing I've ever heard.

BRB

OK, it does say this:
"It is thought by some that Pluto shares its atmosphere with its moon."
but nothing about a single solid body. Maybe he was misunderstanding this:
"Pluto and Charon are also unusual among planets in that they are tidally locked to each other."
 
Last edited:
Well, the article also says (correctly) that the atmosphere freezes regularly.

What it fails to clarify is that if Pluto and Charon do share an atmosphere, then it would only be shared when the atmosphere is not frozen.
 
  • #10
How much do we know about Pluto?

an introduction...
http://www.seds.org/billa/tnp/pluto.html

it should have gone to the general astrology

that was a typo right? :cry:

What it fails to clarify is that if Pluto and Charon do share an atmosphere, then it would only be shared when the atmosphere is not frozen.

Thanks for clarifying that Pete!
When Pluto's atmosphere freezes, it falls to the ground as a kind of snow (not water-snow, of course).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
Phobos said:
an introduction...
http://www.seds.org/billa/tnp/pluto.html

I think that article pretty much sums up my feelings about Pluto. If it were only discovered today, I think we'd classify it as a large comet/asteroid (as Sedna probably will be), but since it's been officially labeled a planet for the last 75 years, why bother changing it now. It would just create too much confusion. Although, I have to admit it *would* be fun to watch the numerologists and astrologers squirm. :devil:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top