What is polarization in the language of photons and QM?

touqra
Messages
284
Reaction score
0
I know what polarization is in classical EM. But what is polarization in the language of photons and QM? I am thinking that it's something to do with spin.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
touqra said:
I know what polarization is in classical EM. But what is polarization in the language of photons and QM? I am thinking that it's something to do with spin.

It is said that two eigenstates of spin correspond to two kinds of circularly polarized states, but I don't know the details too.

Anyone knows what subject deals with this stuff?

Thank u!
 
Photon polarization is usually described in terms of helicity, which can be
+1 or -1 for a photon. The helicity +1 state correspond to Left circular polarization and the -1 to Right circular polarization. A plane polarized photon is the same linear combination of circular polarizations as in Classical EM. The reason H=+1 corrsponds to LH circular polarization is that particle physicsts use a z=axis in the direction the photon is moving, while the classical circular polarization is how the E vector rotates as you look toward the oncoming photon.
 
Meir Achuz said:
Photon polarization is usually described in terms of helicity, which can be
+1 or -1 for a photon. The helicity +1 state correspond to Left circular polarization and the -1 to Right circular polarization. A plane polarized photon is the same linear combination of circular polarizations as in Classical EM. The reason H=+1 corrsponds to LH circular polarization is that particle physicsts use a z=axis in the direction the photon is moving, while the classical circular polarization is how the E vector rotates as you look toward the oncoming photon.

I still want to know how helicity is related to polarization.
Can you recommend some readings?

Thank you!
 
zhangpujumbo said:
I still want to know how helicity is related to polarization.
Can you recommend some readings?

Thank you!

Well, they are not directly related in terms of a formula because both concepts come from different "places" in physics. Polarization comes from EM and helicity is a QM concept since you need the concept of SPIN to define helicity. You do not need spin to define polarization.

Polarization can be defined for both materials (local fluctuations in the electronic density that lead to dipoles or quadrupoles) as well as EM waves

marlon
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top