What is Symmetry about a Point (p,q) and its Relationship to Function Values?

  • Thread starter Thread starter KingKendrick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point Symmetry
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of symmetry of a function about a point (p,q) and its implications on function values. Participants are tasked with showing that a function symmetric about this point satisfies a specific equation involving its values at points p-x and p+x.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants express confusion regarding the symmetry definition and its application. Some attempt to relate the symmetry to integral calculus, while others focus on algebraic manipulation of function values. Questions arise about how to eliminate variables and whether certain assumptions can be made.

Discussion Status

There is a mix of progress and uncertainty among participants. Some have begun to derive relationships between function values, while others seek clarification on specific steps. Guidance has been offered regarding the manipulation of equations, but no consensus on the approach has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention that the problem contrasts with previous classwork, indicating a potential gap in familiarity with the topic. There is also a noted struggle with assumptions and the interpretation of symmetry in this context.

KingKendrick
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A function f is said to symmetric about a point (p,q) if whenever the point (p-x, q-y) is on the graph of f, then the point (p + x, q - y) is also on the graph. Said differently, f is symmetric about a point (p,q) if the line through the points (p,q) and (p+x, q+y) on the graph of y=f(x) intersects the graph at the point (p-x, q-y). Show that a function symmetric about the point (p,q) satifies f(p-x) + f(p+x) = 2f(p) for all x in the interval of interest.

Homework Equations



f(p-x) + f(p+x) = 2f(p)

The Attempt at a Solution



This questions completely contrasts the questions we had been attempting in class. I have never seen anything like this. I tried taking integrals of functions I thought were symmetrical but I could really use some help getting started.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
KingKendrick said:

Homework Statement



A function f is said to symmetric about a point (p,q) if whenever the point (p-x, q-y) is on the graph of f, then the point (p + x, q - y) is also on the graph. Said differently, f is symmetric about a point (p,q) if the line through the points (p,q) and (p+x, q+y) on the graph of y=f(x) intersects the graph at the point (p-x, q-y). Show that a function symmetric about the point (p,q) satifies f(p-x) + f(p+x) = 2f(p) for all x in the interval of interest.

Homework Equations



f(p-x) + f(p+x) = 2f(p)

The Attempt at a Solution



This questions completely contrasts the questions we had been attempting in class. I have never seen anything like this. I tried taking integrals of functions I thought were symmetrical but I could really use some help getting started.

Thanks.

No integrals are needed. If (p,q) is on the graph then f(p)=q. If (p+x,q+y) is on the graph then f(p+x)=q+y. Similar for (p-x,q-y). Write all of those down and try to eliminate the q and y.
 
Last edited:
Could you be a bit more specific or rephrase what you said please?

I wrote

f(p)=q
f(p+x)=q+x
f(p-x)=q-x

and I'm still struggling to figure out what to do next. Would I have to make them equal to each other? What exactly did you mean when you said "eliminate the q"?

Thanks for your help.
 
KingKendrick said:
Could you be a bit more specific or rephrase what you said please?

I wrote

f(p)=q
f(p+x)=q+x
f(p-x)=q-x

and I'm still struggling to figure out what to do next. Would I have to make them equal to each other? What exactly did you mean when you said "eliminate the q"?

Thanks for your help.

I meant add the last two equations and substitute the first one. But thinking about it you probably shouldn't assume x=y. Just leave it as:

f(p)=q
f(p+x)=q+y
f(p-x)=q-y

But same idea.
 
Ok, I made progress but I don't know if I am answering the question or if I am doing something completely random.

Prove: f(p+x) + f(p-x) = 2f(p)

If we can assume

f(p)=q
f(p+x)=q+y
f(p-x)=q-y

then

f(p+y) + f(p-y) = 2q + 0
f(p) + f(y) + f(p) - f(y) = 2q
2f(p) = 2q

We know f(p) = q so...

2f(p) = 2f(p)

Am I doing something right?
 
Last edited:
KingKendrick said:
Ok, I made progress but I don't know if I am answering the question or if I am doing something completely random.

Prove: f(p+x) + f(p-x) = 2f(p)

If we can assume

f(p)=q
f(p+x)=q+y
f(p-x)=q-y

then

f(p+y) + f(p-y) = 2q + 0
f(p) + f(y) + f(p) - f(y) = 2q
2f(p) = 2q

We know f(p) = q so...

2f(p) = 2f(p)

Am I doing something right?

You are doing a few things wrong. Why did you change f(p+x) into f(p+y) and saying f(p+y)=f(p)+f(y) is generally wrong. You don't have to do that. You'll get f(p+x)+f(p-x)=2q, and q=f(p). Soooo? You are almost there.
 
Last edited:
Dick said:
You are doing a few things wrong. Why did you change f(p+x) into f(p+y) and saying f(p+y)=f(p)+f(y) is generally wrong. You don't have to do that. You'll get f(p+x)+f(p-x)=2q, and q=f(p). Soooo?

Haha. I haven't done math for 2 semesters so I'm a bit rusty.

So I revised it to this

f(p+x) + f(p-x) = 2f(p)

f(p)= q
f(p+x) = q+y
f(p-x) = q-y

f(p+x) + f(p-x) = (q+y) + (q-y)
f(p+x) + f(p-x) = 2q

we know f(p) = q so substituting this in the 2q we get

f(p+x) + f(p-x) =2f(p)
 
KingKendrick said:
Haha. I haven't done math for 2 semesters so I'm a bit rusty.

So I revised it to this

f(p+x) + f(p-x) = 2f(p)

f(p)= q
f(p+x) = q+y
f(p-x) = q-y

f(p+x) + f(p-x) = (q+y) + (q-y)
f(p+x) + f(p-x) = 2q

we know f(p) = q so substituting this in the 2q we get

f(p+x) + f(p-x) =2f(p)

Yeah, not so hard, right?
 
Dick said:
Yeah, not so hard, right?

I guess I was thinking it was going to be a tough problem requiring integrals, I actually had the answer at one point and thought it was too obvious and discarded it.

Thanks for all your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K