What is the algebraic proof for the remainder of 11 when dividing by 12?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physiona
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the sum of the squares of any three consecutive odd numbers leaves a remainder of 11 when divided by 12. The user initially defined the odd numbers as 2n+1, 2n+3, and 2n+5, and calculated their squares, leading to the expression 12n^2 + 36n + 35. A participant pointed out that this can be rewritten as 12(n^2 + 3n + 2) + 11, clearly demonstrating the remainder of 11. The user acknowledged the oversight and expressed appreciation for the clarification. The conversation highlights the importance of recognizing algebraic patterns in polynomial expressions.
Physiona
Messages
131
Reaction score
9
Thread moved from the technical forums, so no Homework Template is shown
I'm currently doing a grade 9 paper, and one of the following questions is tripping me up a little bit:

Prove algebraically that the sum of the squares of any three consecutive odd numbers always leaves a remainder of 11, when divided by 12.

My attempt of the question:

I have labelled 3 consecutive odd numbers as:
2n+1, 2n+3, and 2n+5.
I've squared them:
(2n+1)2: 4n2+4n+1
(2n+3)2: 4n2+12n+9
(2n+5)2: 4n2+20n+25

I've attempted to then add all the squared numbers which led me to the expression of: 12n2+36n+35. From here, I have attempted to divide by 12, which leads me to n2+3n+35/12. I'm not sure how to get the remainder of 11, do I take factors out, or is my working solution wrong? Any guidance? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are almost there:

Notice ##12n^2 + 36n + 35 = 12n^2 + 36n + 24 + 11 = 12(n^2 + 3n + 2) +11##

And this proves the claim.
 
  • Like
Likes Physiona
You seem to have done all the hard work and then failed to spot the answer when it's staring you in the face!
 
  • Like
Likes Physiona
Math_QED said:
You are almost there:

Notice ##12n^2 + 36n + 35 = 12n^2 + 36n + 24 + 11 = 12(n^2 + 36n + 2) +11##

And this proves the claim.
Aha, that makes sense! Thank you for the quick reply!
 
PeroK said:
You seem to have done all the hard work and then failed to spot the answer when it's staring you in the face!
Yep, I know! I intend to do that, and it often causes me frustration! I've worked it out now, thank you!
 
The long division algorithm for polynomials is quite similar to that of decimal numbers, and the remainder is defined in the same way in both. In a more difficult case, the divisor can also contain an unknown variable (unlike the divisor 12 in this example). Here's a link to more info.

http://www.purplemath.com/modules/polydiv2.htm
 
Back
Top