What is the Apparent Weight of a Pilot at the Bottom of a Loop?

AI Thread Summary
At the bottom of a loop, the apparent weight of a pilot in an airplane is influenced by both centripetal acceleration and true weight. The pilot experiences a higher apparent weight due to the combination of the upward normal force and the downward gravitational force. While centripetal force points inward, the pilot's true weight acts downward, leading to an increase in apparent weight rather than a cancellation. The concept of centrifugal force, although not a real force, helps explain the pilot's experience of being pushed outward during circular motion. Understanding these forces clarifies why the apparent weight at the bottom of the loop is significantly greater than the pilot's true weight.
physstudent1
Messages
267
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



An airplane flies in a loop (a circular path in a vertical plane) of radius 200m. The pilot's head always points toward the center of the loop. The speed of the airplane is not constant; the airplane goes slowest at the top of the loop and fastest at the bottom.


At the bottom of the loop, the speed of the airplane is 270 km/h. What is the apparent weight of the pilot at this point? His true weight is 710 N.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I know the answer is 2750N; and I have figured that you get it from adding the force caused from the centripetal acceleration + the regular weight I just do not understand why. I thought that the force due to centripetal acceleration points inward toward the center of the loop and that the regular weight would point downward I thought due to this you would subtract the two to get the apparent weight why is this not so?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you are correct that there is a force directed toward the centre of the circular motion referred to as centripetal force. There is also an effect called the centrifugal force which is just due to the inertia of a mass. For example if you think about going round a roundabout in a car quite fast you feel yourself being thrown away from the centre of motion due to the fact that your mass is resisting changing direction. It is called an effective force because there isn't really a force there it just appears as though there is.

The short story is that it turns out the efective centrifugal force is equal in magnitude to the centripetal force but in the opposite direction.
 
I see, so even though centrifugal force should not appear in a free body diagram you should still consider such a force when dealing with a situation with something like apparent weight in circular motion? And how come the centrifugal force and the force pointing inward don't cancel each other out?
 
Last edited:
They don't cancel each other out because centrifugal force is an effective force. This means it doesn't really exist its just something we use to describe a phenomenon of rotating frames. Like I said before its due to the reluctance of a mass to change direction. Take the car going round the roundabout for example. You can feel yourself leaning over until the friction between you and the seat or in extreme cases the normal force of the saide of the car helps you move in a circle. If you sat on a frictionless seat in a car with no sides you would simply slide out due to the fact that there would be no force pushing you toward the centre. In a rotating frame this would lok as though you were affected by an effectine force when of course you are not.
 
I see, thanks for clearing this concept up.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top