What is the Average Physical Work Output per Person in a Specific Time Frame?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gord kyfiuk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Average Per Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on estimating the average physical work output of a person over a specific time frame, acknowledging that individual differences and work environments play a significant role. It highlights a basic relationship between energy output and caloric intake, indicating that an average person can sustain about 100 watts of continuous work, equivalent to 2,000 food calories per day. A healthy, active individual can maintain this output for approximately 8 hours. The calculations provided show that 2,000 calories translate to about 8,372,000 joules per day, or roughly 100 watts. This information helps in understanding the connection between physical work output and caloric consumption.
gord kyfiuk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I realize that there are numerous factors to be considered when attempting to calculate something like this as no two people are alike, work environments differ, etc, but what I am trying to find out is roughly even, how much physical work (FxD=W) an average person can do in a specific time and if perhaps there is a verifiable (equation) connection to that persons caloric intake?
Ex- on average, how much work could an average person under average/ideal/set working conditions produce per day/hour etc.
EVen if you do not have an answer to this rather strange question directly, could you please point me in the right direction perhaps.
Thank you for you time and consideration,
Gord
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is a basic relation between watts and food calories:

100 watts continuous (like metabolic rate) ≡ 2000 food calories per day.

A healthy active athletic person can work at ~100 watts continuous for 8 hours.

Use 1 food calorie = 4186 joules

So 2000 food calories/day = 8,372,000 joules/day

Divide by 24 and 3600 and get 96.9 joules/second = ~100 watts.

Bob S
 
Thank you Bob, that was just the sort of information I was searching for.
Much appreciated.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top