What is the basis in crystalline solid structures?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter u_know_who
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of "basis" in crystalline solid structures, specifically addressing the CsCl structure, which is classified as Simple Cubic (SC) with two basis atoms (Cs+ and Cl-). Participants clarify that while Body Centered Cubic (BCC) can be viewed as SC with two atoms, it is fundamentally distinct due to the occupancy of lattice sites by different species. The unique symmetry properties of BCC and CsCl are highlighted, with references to Chapter 4 of "Solid State Physics" by Ashcroft and Mermin for further explanation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of crystalline solid structures
  • Familiarity with Bravais lattices
  • Knowledge of symmetry groups in crystallography
  • Basic principles of solid-state physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the differences between Simple Cubic and Body Centered Cubic structures
  • Explore the concept of basis in crystallography
  • Review symmetry groups in solid-state physics
  • Read Chapter 4 of "Solid State Physics" by Ashcroft and Mermin for detailed insights
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in materials science, solid-state physics researchers, and anyone interested in the structural properties of crystalline materials.

u_know_who
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello, while studying crystalline solid structure one thing i don't understand. What does the "basis" means. Lattice seems clear but the basis comes along with problem. The problem arise in this case :

CsCl structure is not BCC (Body Centered Cubic). It is SC (Simple Cubic) with two basis.

That what says in the book.

My question is, if i consider CsCl is not BCC and it can be represented by SC with two basis (CS+ and Cl-) then why can't we imagine or consider original BCC structure as a combination of SC with two basis (two Fe atoms). But it is clearly declared that BCC is an unique Bravis lattice.

Can anyone clear me out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the iron atoms are symmetry equivalent with respect to translations while a Cs and a Cl atom are clearly not. The same holds already in molecular physics Fe_2 molecule has symmetry group \text{D}_{\infty h} while CsCl has only \text{C}_{\infty v}.
 
There is nothing wrong at all in considering BCC as simple cubic with two atoms as a basis. Similarly, FCC is a simple cubic with four atoms as a basis.

However, CsCl CANNOT be BCC because BCC sites are not occupied by the same species.

Chapter 4 in Solid State Physics by Ashcroft and Mermin gives a crystal clear explanation for these details.
 
Useful nucleus said:
There is nothing wrong at all in considering BCC as simple cubic with two atoms as a basis. Similarly, FCC is a simple cubic with four atoms as a basis.

However, CsCl CANNOT be BCC because BCC sites are not occupied by the same species.

Chapter 4 in Solid State Physics by Ashcroft and Mermin gives a crystal clear explanation for these details.
Yes, but you are considering then only a sub-group of the full crystallographic group and thus loose information.
 
Can you elaborate more on this, please?
 
The crystal must at least two basis if they are SCC. Similarly, FCC at least four basis.
 
If you treat e.g. iron using an enlarged unit cell, you resign to make use of the fact that the two iron atoms in your basis are symmetry equivalent.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
31K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K