What Is the Best Method to Calculate Gas Flow Through an Orifice?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate gas flow through an orifice linking two vessels at different pressures, the ISO 5167-2 standard provides comprehensive equations and uncertainty analysis for orifice flow rates. The discussion highlights the use of the LenoxLaser calculator for quick approximations, although it lacks detailed explanations. For simpler calculations, the Critical Flow Venturi formula, referenced in ISO 9300, is suggested as an ideal case. Dimensional analysis indicates insufficient information for determining flow type without additional parameters. Accurate modeling of gas flow requires adherence to established standards and consideration of specific orifice shapes.
FranzS
Messages
86
Reaction score
26
Summary:: How to find gas flow through an orifice that links two vessels at different pressures.

Two vessels containing the same gas are linked through an orifice with diameter ##d##. The pressure inside vessel 1 is ##P_1## and the pressure inside vessel 2 is ##P_2##, and let's have ##P_1>P_2## (both are known values). These pressures never change despite the gas flow from vessel 1 to vessel 2 (I guess it's like assuming the vessels have infinite volumes).
Which formula should I use to find out the gas flow (for example, number of moles per second) from vessel 1 to vessel 2, as a function of the pressures ##P_1##, ##P_2## and the orifice diameter ##d##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What did you find in your 'toolbox' (textbook, notes, ...) ?
Or on the net ?

##\ ##
 
BvU said:
What did you find in your 'toolbox' (textbook, notes, ...) ?
Or on the net ?

##\ ##
I came across some "orifice equations" and "discharge coefficient", but these formulae take into account pipe diameters and/or potential energy of the fluid (gravity acceleration and height)... I honestly can't find what I'm searching for.
By the way, I'm assuming an ideally isothermal process.
I found this online calculator which provides what I'm looking for, but I do not know which formula it uses:
https://lenoxlaser.com/resources/calculators/orifice-calculator/

By the way, I see it was moved to Homework help, which actuaslly isn't.
 
We had a comparable thread here. Calculator there any use ?
At least is's orifice flow and it shows the equations.

##\ ##
 
Dimensional analysis reveals there is not enough info.
You are given only a pressure difference, ##ML^{-1}T^{-2}##, and a linear distance, ##L##.
It's unclear whether you are to find the volumetric flow or the mass flow. Since there's an irremovable M in the inputs, suppose it is mass flow. But that is ##MT^{-1}##. There is no way to construct that. Combining the inputs to remove the L leaves ##MT^{-2}##.
 
Hi,

I use the LenoxLaser calculator for orifice flow approximations when I need something fast. I agree with you that their explanation is bit underwhelming [1]. From that I assume you are interested in details and accuracy.

The ISO standard for flow rate through orifices is ISO 5167-2. The equations and uncertainty analysis is there for you. As well as best practices. Note that this standard has a series for different orifice shapes.

If you need something simpler than the orifice equation. The Critical Flow Venturi formula is as simple as it gets (because it is an ideal case). For that, the relevant standard is ISO 9300.

Equations 1 and 2 of [4] is what I use for your problem. References:
[1] lenox laser orifice calculator explanation https://lenoxlaser.com/publications/fluid-flow-through-calibrated-orifices/
[2] ISO 5167-2 Orifice plates https://www.iso.org/standard/30190.html
[3]ISO 9300 CFV https://www.iso.org/standard/34272.html
[4] NIST comparison of theoretical CFV models to experiment. https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=830961
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top