What is the Branch of Mathematics that Maps Entire Sub-Disciplines?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lacy33
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying a branch of mathematics that maps entire sub-disciplines, with initial suggestions including topos theory and category theory. Category theory is highlighted as a relevant field, characterized by its focus on objects and morphisms, which can represent various mathematical structures. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these concepts to avoid confusion and wasted time in research. Participants express gratitude for the insights shared, indicating a collaborative effort to clarify the topic. The discussion concludes with an acknowledgment of the value of community assistance in navigating complex mathematical concepts.
Lacy33
Messages
242
Reaction score
1
A friend just emailed me the following guestion, would anyone know what this field is called please.

"A few years ago a friend and colleague of mine had told me about a branch of mathematics or metamathematics that dealt with mapping entire sub-disciplines of mathematics and, I think, physics.

This had seemed to me or perhaps he told me that this was an extension of topology, and I distinctly remember getting a text on the subject and starting, though only starting to read it.

The question is: what is the name of this subject. It's not category theory nor is it fuzzy set theory, though that's been ""'s primary focus for some time. I thought it was something relatively short beginning with a 'T'.

I've had no luck trying to find the term on the WEB."
Thank you,
Suzanne
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
topos theory ?
 
roger said:
topos theory ?

Thank you very much Roger.

Suzanne
 
Try "Category Theory". A "category" consists of a collection of objects together with functions, called "morphisms" from the collection of objects to itself. In the category of sets, the morphisms are functions from one set to another. In the category of groups the objects are groups, the morphism are homomorphisms. In the category of topologies, the objects are topological spaces, the morphisms are continuous functions. There are also "functors" from one category to another. One I remember was the "forgetful" functor. A group is a set with an operation defined. The "forgetful" functor from the category of groups to the category of sets mapped each group to its underlying set, each homomorphism to its underlying function, "forgetting" the group operation.

Warning! At least one text I saw referred to category theory, apparently quite seriously, as "abstract non-sense"!
 
OK.
Thank you HallsofIvy. I will pass this along to my friend.
He may be following this thread now.
Thank you all for your assistance.
So easy to get caught going down a dead end when time is so important and learning even more so.
S
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top