What is the Center of Mass of a Rod with Varying Linear Density?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the center of mass of a rod with varying linear density defined by the equation λ = 50.0 g/m + 20.0x g/m². The correct mass of the rod is determined through integration, yielding a mass of 15.9 g and a center of mass located at 0.159 m from the x = 0 end. Participants clarify the integration process and the application of the formulas, emphasizing that λ cannot be treated as a constant due to its dependence on x.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear density and its mathematical representation.
  • Familiarity with integration techniques in calculus.
  • Knowledge of the center of mass formula for continuous mass distributions.
  • Ability to apply definite integrals to solve for mass and center of mass.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of integrating variable functions in calculus.
  • Learn about the application of the center of mass formula in physics.
  • Explore examples of varying linear density problems in mechanics.
  • Review the concept of mass distribution and its implications in physics.
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, particularly those studying mechanics and mass distribution, as well as educators looking for examples of varying linear density applications.

bolivartech
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A rod of length 30.0 cm has linear density (mass-per-length) given by

λ = 50.0 g/m + 20.0x g/m2

where x is the distance from one end, measured in meters. (a) What is the mass of the rod?

(b) How far from the x = 0 end is the center of mass?

Homework Equations



Xcm = l/2

The Attempt at a Solution



λ = 50.0 g/m + (20.0)(.3m) g/m2

λ = 56 g/m * .3 m

λ = 16.8 g

Xcm = .3/2 = .15

The actual answers are 15.9 g and .159 m

Am I not using the formulas correctly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
m=\int\limits_0^L \lambda(x) {\rm d}x

x_G=\frac 1 m \int\limits_0^L x\lambda(x) {\rm d}x
 
Would I consider λ a constant.

m = λ1/2x2

m = (50.0 g/m + (20.0)(.3m) g/m2)(1/2)(.32)

of integrate it as well. Both ways that doesn't seem to be the right answer either. I get 2.43 if I integrate λ, and 2.52 if I don't.
 
bolivartech said:
Would I consider λ a constant.

\lambda(x) is a function of x that happens to be 50.0 + 20.0x, so you replace

\lambda(x) by 50.0 + 20.0x and integrate the result.
 
This is ridiculously when you put it that way. Thanks, I understand how to apply the formulas now. Hopefully when it gets rearranged for a test I will still see it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K