What is the Center of Mass of a Rod with Varying Linear Density?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the center of mass of a rod with a varying linear density described by a specific function. The rod's length is given, and the linear density is expressed as a function of distance along the rod.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration of the linear density function to find the mass and center of mass. There are questions about whether to treat the linear density as a constant and how to apply the relevant formulas correctly.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on integrating the linear density function, while others express confusion about the application of formulas and the results obtained. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of differing results based on whether the linear density is treated as constant or variable, indicating a potential misunderstanding of the problem setup. The original poster also notes discrepancies between their calculations and expected answers.

bolivartech
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A rod of length 30.0 cm has linear density (mass-per-length) given by

λ = 50.0 g/m + 20.0x g/m2

where x is the distance from one end, measured in meters. (a) What is the mass of the rod?

(b) How far from the x = 0 end is the center of mass?

Homework Equations



Xcm = l/2

The Attempt at a Solution



λ = 50.0 g/m + (20.0)(.3m) g/m2

λ = 56 g/m * .3 m

λ = 16.8 g

Xcm = .3/2 = .15

The actual answers are 15.9 g and .159 m

Am I not using the formulas correctly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
m=\int\limits_0^L \lambda(x) {\rm d}x

x_G=\frac 1 m \int\limits_0^L x\lambda(x) {\rm d}x
 
Would I consider λ a constant.

m = λ1/2x2

m = (50.0 g/m + (20.0)(.3m) g/m2)(1/2)(.32)

of integrate it as well. Both ways that doesn't seem to be the right answer either. I get 2.43 if I integrate λ, and 2.52 if I don't.
 
bolivartech said:
Would I consider λ a constant.

\lambda(x) is a function of x that happens to be 50.0 + 20.0x, so you replace

\lambda(x) by 50.0 + 20.0x and integrate the result.
 
This is ridiculously when you put it that way. Thanks, I understand how to apply the formulas now. Hopefully when it gets rearranged for a test I will still see it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K