What is the charge in the middle of the square?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ammora
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Square
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the electric field at the center of a square with one positive charge and three negative charges located at its corners. The square has sides of 9.0 cm, and the charges are specified as +18.0 µC at one corner and -6.0 µC at the other three corners.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the contributions of different charges to the electric field at the center, noting that some charges cancel each other out. There is confusion regarding the calculation of the distance and the correct application of the electric field formula.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning assumptions about the contributions of each charge and the direction of the electric field. Some guidance has been offered regarding the correct interpretation of the signs of the charges and their effects on the field direction. However, there is no explicit consensus on the correct numerical answer, and some participants express frustration over submission limits.

Contextual Notes

Participants are reminded to convert units from centimeters to meters, and there is ongoing discussion about the meaning of variables in the electric field formula, particularly the permittivity of free space.

Ammora
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



As shown in the figure, a square has sides of d = 9.0 cm with a charge of Q = +18.0 µC at one corner (a) and with charges of q = -6.0 µC at the remaining three corners (b, c, and d).

Image: http://www.webassign.net/grrphys2/17-p-018-alt.gif"

Find the electric field at the center of the square.
magnitude _____ N/C

Homework Equations



E=kq/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



Since the charges at corners b and d are the same, they cancel each other out, they won't contribute to the field in the middle. So the only corners we have to worry about are corners a and c. Ea = 18 uC/(4 pi eps d^2)
From the charge in c, the field strength is Ec = -6 uC/(4 pi eps d^2)

So the total field (both are directed toward c) = (12 uC) / (4 pi eps0 d^2).

The only thing I don't know how to calculate is r. I tried 4.5 sqrt. 2. I tried 0.09. I tried 3 sqrt. 2. None of them worked. Can you please help me?

I only have one more answer to try. I just thought of something, what if I try 4 sqrt (0.09 m)? Will that work?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ammora said:
Since the charges at corners b and d are the same, they cancel each other out, they won't contribute to the field in the middle. So the only corners we have to worry about are corners a and c.
Good!
The only thing I don't know how to calculate is r. I tried 4.5 sqrt. 2. I tried 0.09. I tried 3 sqrt. 2. None of them worked. Can you please help me?
Careful with units. Express the length in meters, not cm. (The first answer is correct, but it's in cm.)
 
Oh, so it should be 0.045 m sqrt. 2? Thank you so much, I wasn't paying attention to my units. This forum is awesome, I get such quick helpful replies, and I learn, not just copy.
 
Ammora said:
Oh, so it should be 0.045 m sqrt. 2?
Right!
 
Well, it says it's wrong. And that was my last submission :frown:

Thanks anyway for the quick reply.
 
Ammora said:
Well, it says it's wrong. And that was my last submission
Oh well. But at least you had the distance right!

ah... I see the problem. For some reason you subtracted the field from each charge. But those fields act in the same direction, so they add up.

(My apologies for not looking at the rest of your post that carefully. :rolleyes:)
 
I did add them. 18 + -6 = 12.
I still don't understand what I did wrong.
 
Ammora said:
I did add them. 18 + -6 = 12.
I still don't understand what I did wrong.
The problem is that you cannot blindly plug the charge into the formula E = Q/(4πε r2) to get the field, since the direction of the field depends on where you are with respect to the charge.

My recommendation is to use the formula to get the magnitude of the field, then use the sign of the charge to get the direction of the field. In this case:
- The charge at a is positive, so the field points away from a. Thus, at the midpoint, the field from charge Qa points toward c.
- The charge at c is negative, so the field points toward c. Thus, at the midpoint, the field from charge Qc points toward c.

To get the total field at the midpoint, you'll need to add the magnitudes, since they are pointing in the same direction.

Make sense?
 
Yes, the third part of the question was in what direction, and I already answered in "towards corner C" and they said it was correct.
I understand everything you said, it makes sense to me, but that's not enough to pass the class, I have to get the number right also. I have no way of checking my answer now because I used up all my submissions. I've been adding the fields from submission 1, and it says it's incorrect.
 
  • #10
Ammora said:
I've been adding the fields from submission 1, and it says it's incorrect.
What you added was what you got from plugging into the formula:
Ammora said:
Ea = 18 uC/(4 pi eps d^2)
From the charge in c, the field strength is Ec = -6 uC/(4 pi eps d^2)
The problem with that is that those signs don't mean anything.

What you should have done:
Ea = 18 uC/(4 pi eps d^2) (towards c)
Ec = 6 uC/(4 pi eps d^2) (towards c)

Since they both point in the same direction, just add them up: Etotal = (18 + 6)uC/(4 pi eps d^2) (towards c)

Imagine how it would have been different if the charge at c were positive. In that case, Ec would have pointed away from c, the opposite to Ea. In that case you would have gotten Etotal = (18 - 6)uC/(4 pi eps d^2) (towards c)
 
  • #11
Oh ok, I see. You're right, I'm sorry for getting so confused.
Oh well, even if I can't get points for it now, at least I'll know what to do when the test comes around. Thank you very much for being patient with me.
 
  • #12
what is epsilon here? what number would that be? what would i plug in for epsilon? and is d the distance? which would be r?
Ea = 18 uC/(4 pi eps d^2) (towards c)
Ec = 6 uC/(4 pi eps d^2) (towards c)
 
  • #13
learning90 said:
what is epsilon here? what number would that be? what would i plug in for epsilon?
ε0 is the permittivity of free space. See: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elefor.html"
and is d the distance? which would be r?
Yes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
937
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K