What is the connection between pQCD, NRQCD, and Heavy Quark Effective Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BuckeyePhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qcd
BuckeyePhysicist
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
What is the relationship between pQCD and NRQCD?

Is it that pQCD is for high energy/short-distance regime, e.g. quark gluon plasma? And NRQCD is for low energy/long-distance regime, e.g. quarkonium ?

And what is relation between heavy quark effective theory and pQCD and that between heavy quark effective theory and NRQCD ?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pQCD works in the perturbitive region where \alpha_s the strong coupling constant is small, Matrix elements for physical processes are obtained from expansion in this parameter. NRQCD works as an effective field theory for quarks with velocities much less than the speed of light and the results obtained are expansions in the parameter (\alpha/v)^n. pNRQCD is obtained from the low velocity limit of the QCD Lagrangian. The NRQCD effective theory is useful when heavy quarks are produced near threshold and hence have small velocites, whereas in the high energy regieme pQCD is used.
 
NRQCD expends in powers of (\alpha/v)^n but not \beta ? \beta = v/c where
v is the relative velocity of the two heavy quark constituents for quarkonium. \beta ~ 0.3 for charmonium and \beta ~0.1 for bottomonium, right?
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top