What is the constant temperature (M) of the kitchen?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the constant temperature (M) of a kitchen using Newton's law of cooling. The original poster presents a scenario where a pot of boiling water cools over time, providing temperature readings at specific intervals to establish a mathematical model.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Newton's law of cooling and the setup of differential equations. There are attempts to manipulate equations to isolate variables, with some participants suggesting different methods to eliminate unknowns. Questions arise regarding the correctness of derived equations and the interpretation of constants involved.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights and alternative approaches to the problem, indicating a collaborative effort to clarify the mathematical relationships involved. There is recognition of multiple interpretations of the equations, but no explicit consensus has been reached on a single method or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the presence of three unknowns (C, k, and M) and the need for three equations to solve for them. There is also mention of potential confusion regarding the forms of the equations derived from the differential equation.

rad0786
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
I need some help.

A pot of boiling water at 100C is removed from a stove at time t = o and left to cool in the kitchen. After 5 min, the water temperature has decreased to 80C, and another 5min later it has dropped to 65C. Assume Newtons law of cooling (dT/dt = k(M - T) ) applies, determain the constant temperature (M) of the kitchen.

Okay, so the solution to the differential equation is - T= Ce^(kt) + M and we want to solve for M

T(0) = C +M
100 = C + M

Equation 1.
T(5) = Ce^(k5) + M
80 = Ce^(k5) + M

Equation 2.
T(10) = Ce^(k10) + M
65 = Ce^(k10) + M

Therefore.. the 2 equations are
80 = Ce^(k5) + M
65 = Ce^(k10) + M

and if I subtract them, I get

15 = Ce^(k5) - Ce^(k10)

And this is where I am lost. I have no idea how to solve for M

Can somebody help me please?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So you have:

[tex]\frac{dT}{dt}=k(M-T)[/tex]

or:

[tex]\frac{dT}{M-T}=kdt[/tex]

Integrating:

[tex]-ln(M-T)=kt+C[/tex]

or:

[tex]ln(M-T)=C-kt[/tex]

(minus c, plus c same dif it's arbitrary)

so that:

[tex]M-T=e^{C-kt}[/tex]

or:

[tex]T(t)=M-ce^{-kt}[/tex]

So you have 3 conditions, and 3 unknowns, kinda' messy but try and make those substitutions and then solve for something like M in terms of c, c in terms of k, then substitute that into one of them to solve for k, then the others.
 
Last edited:
You are given the temperature at 3 times because you have 3 unknown numbers (C, k, and M) and need to solve 3 equations. You wrote the third equation but didn't number it or use it: C+ M= 100.

You can use that to write the two equations 80= Ce5k+ M and 65= Ce10k+ M as 80= (100-M)e5k+ M and 65= (100-M)e10k+ M. Now, you want to eliminate k, not M, from those equations. Since e10k= (e5k)2 one way to do that is to write (80- M)2= (100-M)2e10k and 65- M= (100-M)e10k and divide one equation by the other. You get
[tex]\frac{(80-M)^2}{65-M}= 100- M[/tex].
That's a quadratic equation for M.
 
Salty dog, when i originally did solved the differential equation, i got the same answer as you, T= M - Ce^(-kt)

However, my textbook solution gives T= Ce^(kt) + M.

Now I am really confused. which one is right?

Well... I did land at the same answer for M for both answers, so i assume they are both correct
 
Last edited:
Since C, k, and M are arbitrary constants their algebraic sign is arbitrary until you have determined their value.
 
Ok guys. Didn't notice that.

They are the same equation when solved for the constants:

[tex]T=M-Ce^{-kt};\;M=20,\;C=-80,\;k=0.0575[/tex]

[tex]T=M+Ce^{kt};\;M=20,\;C=80,\;k=-0.0575[/tex]
 
okay i have one more differential equation...

m(dv/dt) = mg - bv

where m is the mass, g is the acceleration of gravity, and b>0 is a constant.
if m = 100kg, g = 9.8m/s^2 and b=5 kg/sec, and v(0) = 10m/s, solve for v(t). what is the terminal velocity of the object.

So firstly, i want to solve for this differential equation.
But i cannot find a way to separate it. (i mean, its not seperable?)

m(dv/dt) = mg - bv
(dv/dt) = g - bv/m

then i pluged in the numbers and got

(dv/dt) = 9.8 - 0.05v

and that's about as far as i could get.

could somebody please give me a little push

thanks
 
It is seperable, I'm not sure that's the
way i would solve it but:

(dv/dt) = g - (b/m)v => dv/(g - vb/m)= dt

then a change of variables v -> vb/m turns this
into a simple integral.
 
oh actually you are right...

dv/(g - vb/m)= dt and you sub in the constants to get

dv/(9.8-0.05v) = dt and solve

(-1/0.05)ln|9.8 - 0.05v| = t + c

and isolate for v to get

v(t) = 196 - 20e^(-0.05t)(c)

and given that v(0) = 10, you can solve for C to get

v(t) = 196 - 186e^(-0.05t)

Now.. the problem asks "What is the limiting (i.e, terminal) velocity of the object?"

Would that just be the limit t-> infinity ? that would get 10m/s?
 
  • #10
the idea is right:

v_term = limit (t->infinity) 196 - 186 exp(- t/20) = 196.

given v(0) = v0 and m dv/dt = mg - bv we get:
v(t) = gm/b + (v0 - gm/b)exp(-bt/m)

and v_terminal = limit (t-> infinity) v(t).
thus v_terminal = gm/b

[ as lim t->infinity exp(-k*t) = 0 if k>0 ]

we can check the answer, since at v_terminal
there is no acceleration. that is dv/dt = 0 at v_terminal
and the equation of motion is:

m dv/dt = 0 = m g - b v_terminal
=> v_terminal = mg/b.

i always like problems that have built in checks
to see whether or not i get the right answer.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
16K