Coriolis force: I don't see a more effective way of describing it other than by the definition...
Suppose you have two coordinate systems whose origin meet and one of them is rotating with respect to the other. The rotation can be anything, it doesn't have to be at contant in speed nor does it have to be around a fixed axis.
Let [itex]\vec{\omega}[/itex] denote that angular velocity (function) at which the rotating coordinate system rotates around the other and let [itex]\vec{r}[/itex] be the position vector of any given point in space. Since the origin of the two coordinate systems meet, the vector position is the same in both coordinate systems (although the components of that vector will most likely be different depending on which coordinate system we express it).
A bit of vector analysis shows that the rate of change of the rate of change (acceleration) of the vector position, as "measured" in the fixed system, is related to the rate of change of the rate of change (acceleration) of the vector position as "measured" in the rotating system through the equation:
[tex]\frac{d^2\vec{r}}{dt^2}=\frac{d^{*2}\vec{r}}{dt^2} + \vec{\omega}\times(\vec{\omega}\times\vec{r})+2\vec{\omega}\times\frac{d^{*}\vec{r}}{dt}+\frac{d\vec{\omega}}{dt}\times\vec{r}[/tex]
where the starred derivative denotes the derivative of the vector r as "measured" in the rotating system (it is different then the derivative measured in the fixed system).
We call this whole equation Coriolis' theorem and we call the third term on the RHS
[tex]2\vec{\omega}\times\frac{d^{*}\vec{r}}{dt}[/tex]
the coriolis acceleration (because it has the dimensions of an acceleration [distance divided by time squared]).
If now, we multiply both sides of Coriolis' theorem by m and we suppose that the vector r refers to the position in space of a particle of mass m, then the left-hand side of Coriolis' theorem is (according to Newton's second law), the force on that particle. By rearanging the terms a little, we can write
[tex]m\frac{d^{*2}\vec{r}}{dt^2}= \vec{F} - m\vec{\omega}\times(\vec{\omega}\times\vec{r})-2m\vec{\omega}\times\frac{d^{*}\vec{r}}{dt}-m\frac{d\vec{\omega}}{dt}\times\vec{r}[/tex]
and the term we called coriolis acceleration we now call coriolis force (because it now has the dimensions of a force [mass times distance divided by time squared]).
We see that the coriolis force is not a force at all but rather a "correction" to F=ma in a rotating coordinate system. In other words, Newton's second law does not hold in a rotating coordinate system in the sense that
[tex]m\frac{d^{*2}\vec{r}}{dt^2} \neq \vec{F}[/tex]
but if we introduce the "ficticious forces"
[tex]-m\vec{\omega}\times(\vec{\omega}\times\vec{r})[/tex]
[tex]-2m\vec{\omega}\times\frac{d^{*}\vec{r}}{dt}[/tex]
and
[tex]-m\frac{d\vec{\omega}}{dt}\times\vec{r}[/tex]
then it does "hold".
Its applications: It is often useful when studying a phenomenon, to adopt the point of view of a rotating coordinate system. Symon (pp.279) gives the exemple of the action of a cream separator, for which it is much more convenient to adopt a point of view in which the liquid is at rest and use the law of diffusion to study the diffusion of the cream towards the axis under the action of the centrigugal force field, than to try to study the motion from the point of view of a fixed observer watching the whirling liquid.