What is the correct method for finding the lattice constant of NaCl?

  • Thread starter Thread starter paperstars
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Lattice
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on determining the lattice constant of NaCl, which is a simple cubic lattice with alternating Na and Cl atoms. The effective radii of Na and Cl are given as 1.0 angstroms and 1.8 angstroms, respectively. A calculation suggests that the lattice constant should be 5.6 angstroms, derived from the formula a = 2(r1 + r2), while a solutions manual indicates the correct value is 2.8 angstroms, using a = r1 + r2. The confusion arises from differing interpretations of how to calculate the lattice constant, leading to uncertainty about the correct method. Clarification on the appropriate formula and reasoning is sought to resolve this discrepancy.
paperstars
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



NaCl is a simple cubic lattice, with the Na and Cl atoms alternating positions. Assuming that the atoms are hard spheres with nearest neighbors touching, what is the lattice constant of NaCl? (The effective radius of Na is 1.0 angstroms, and the effective radius of Cl is 1.8 angstroms.)

Homework Equations



lattice constant = 2 * radius

=> a = 2r

The Attempt at a Solution



I did a = 2 (r1 + r2) = 2(1.0 + 1.8) = 5.6 angstroms. I've googled the lattice constant of NaCl to be 5.65 angstroms.

However, my solutions manual says that a = r1 + r2 = 1.0 + 1.8 = 2.8 angstroms is the correct answer.

I thought that the lattice constant is equal to the complete distance of the two atoms, from one end to the other, so that means 2r.

I'm wondering which answer is correct and why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please help, I actually lost a little sleep last night trying to figure this out. :-p

I asked my professor and he didn't give me a straight answer on whether my method of thinking is correct or not. However, my impression from his response was my method was correct but on second thought, I'm having doubts.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K