What is the correct method for solving thermal conductivity in this problem?

Click For Summary
To determine the thermal conductivity of a metal rod with one end at 100°C and the other at 0°C, the heat flow is calculated based on the mass of ice melted and the time taken. The first calculation yields a thermal conductivity of 0.381 cal/cm·s·C, while a classmate's method suggests a value of 0.777 cal/cm·s·C. The discrepancy arises from whether to divide or multiply by the 30% heat loss factor. The correct approach is to divide by 0.70, as this accounts for the heat lost to the surroundings. Thus, the final thermal conductivity should be approximately 0.777 cal/cm·s·C.
Zhao_1911
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


One end of a metal rod is maintained at 100 degrees C, and the other end is maintained at 0 degrees C by an ice-water mixture. The rod is 60 cm long and has a cross-sectional area of 1.25 cm^2. The heat conducted by the rod melts 8.50 g of ice in 10.0 min. Find the thermal conductivity of the metal if 30% of heat is lost to the surroundings.


Homework Equations


(Q/t) = mLf/t
where (Q/t) is the heat flow, Lf is the latent heat of fusion

(Q/t) = KA(delta T)/L
where K is the thermal conductivity of the metal, A is the area, delta T is the temperature difference, and L is the length.


The Attempt at a Solution


First, I solved the heat flow of the metal using the mass of the melted ice and the time it took to melt that amount of ice;

(Q/t)= [8.5g(80cal/g)x.70]/600s = 119/150 cal/s

Then I solved the K of the metal;

119/150 cal/s = [K(1.25 cm^2)(100C-0C)]/60 cm
K = 0.381 cal/cm.s.C

BUT THEN..
I saw a solution of my classmate that used something like this;

(Q/t)={[8.5g(80cal/g)]/.70}/600s = 34/21 cal/s

so his K is about 0.777 cal/cm.s.C

that's where I'm confused. Should I divide or multiply the .70?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your friend is correct.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
548
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
15K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K