What is the correct sign convention for the lens and mirror formula?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rishch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Lens Mirror
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the discrepancies between two lens formulas: 1/f = 1/v - 1/u and 1/f = 1/v + 1/u. The first formula follows the "New Cartesian" sign convention, where left is negative and right is positive, while the second formula adopts a different convention, treating object distance as positive regardless of its position. Participants express confusion over incorporating negative distances in geometric proofs and emphasize the importance of visual aids, such as sketches, to clarify these concepts. Ultimately, the differences arise from varying sign conventions that impact the interpretation of distances in optics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of lens formulas in optics
  • Familiarity with Cartesian coordinate systems
  • Basic knowledge of geometric proofs
  • Concept of similar triangles in geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the "New Cartesian" sign convention in optics
  • Study the derivation of the lens formula using different sign conventions
  • Learn how to incorporate negative distances in geometric proofs
  • Explore visual aids and sketches for understanding optical principles
USEFUL FOR

Students of optics, physics educators, and anyone seeking clarity on lens formulas and sign conventions in geometric optics.

rishch
Messages
106
Reaction score
1
So we are learning the lens formula and I have two textbooks, my school textbook and another one that is much more detailed. My school textbook gives the lens formula as:-

1/f=1/v-1/u

while the other one gives

1/f=1/v+1/u (v is image distance and u is object distance)

There both different! I looked them some more and the problem is that my school textbook follows some "New Cartesian" sign convention. Imagine the optical center as the origin and the principal axis as the x-axis and the vertical line down the mirror as the y axis. So left is negative, right is positive, up is positive and down is negative. Just like a graph. The other one does the same except that even if the object is on the left they take it as positive.

I went to Khan Academy and he had a proof and he came up with the second one, different from the one in my school textbook. I tried doing the proofs on my own but I don't know how to include negative distances in geometry. Do you take the lengths as negative? Then you can't use similarity of triangles because some sides have negative length and others, positive. How do you work with negative distances? Getting really confused :/
 
Science news on Phys.org
The differences are due to different sign conventions all right.
I've never been able to keep them straight and I always rely on a quick sketch of the situation as a reality check.

Note: Triangles are similar if all the angles are the same ... with negative distances, you get a negative scale factor.
 
The differences are due to different sign conventions all right.
I've never been able to keep them straight and I always rely on a quick sketch of the situation as a reality check.

Note: Triangles are similar if all the angles are the same ... with negative distances, you get a negative scale factor.
 
Actually I find the cartesian plane sign convention really good as it's easy to remember if you just thing of it like a graph or number line. Left is negative and right is positive. Yes but during proofs one pair of corresponding sides may have a negative scale factor and one may have a positive scale factor. I managed to come up with an alternative neat solution to the problem after a bit of thinking though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K