1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Refraction Formula For Thin Lens

  1. Nov 9, 2015 #1
    I was browsing about my optics books,completing numericals and stuff
    When I found a a statement called different lens formulas
    It had 2 formulas
    One,called the thin lens formula or rather the geometric sign convention formula was called 1/v-1/u=1/f(Symbols have their usual meanings) and another one called the virtual-real sign convention formula which was 1/v+1/u=1/f
    I know that for a thin lens 1/S0 +1/SI=1/F
    Where S0,SI are the object and image distances respectively
    So is the statement correct
    Or is it just one formula made into two because of the Cartesian SIgn Convention???
    Some insight is much appreciated
    Thanks!!!
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 9, 2015 #2

    BvU

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Both are 'correct'. See Hyperphysics where they tell you all the details.

    And yes, the Cartesian sign convention flips the sign.

    (But now I am personally confused by the minus sign for f in the second link :frown: . Anyone ? )

    perhaps this helps ?
     
    Last edited: Nov 9, 2015
  4. Nov 9, 2015 #3
    It helped quite a lot
    But my question is why are there 2 lens equations to begin with
    I personally use the gaussian formula with sign convention
    I never really have used the real-virtual one
     
  5. Nov 10, 2015 #4

    BvU

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Same here. But the link reveals that
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Refraction Formula For Thin Lens
  1. Thin-lens equation (Replies: 2)

  2. Thin lens formula (Replies: 11)

  3. Thin lens (Replies: 3)

Loading...