What is the Cosine Fourier Transform of an Exponential Function?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the cosine Fourier transform of the exponential function f(t) = e^(-at). Participants are exploring the integration process and the implications of the function's behavior as t approaches infinity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conversion of the cosine function into exponential form for integration and the subsequent steps needed to evaluate the integral. There are questions about the correctness of intermediate results and the necessity of a common denominator. Some suggest using integration by parts as an alternative approach.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the integration limits and the behavior of the terms as t approaches infinity. Some participants have pointed out potential issues with convergence and the need to consider the behavior of the exponential function in relation to the trigonometric functions involved.

Contextual Notes

There is an implied assumption that a > 0, which affects the convergence of the integral and the behavior of the functions involved as t approaches infinity.

Jalo
Messages
117
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the cosine Fourier transform of the function f(t)=e-at

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



F(w)=(2/π)0.5∫dt e-atcos(wt)
The integral is from 0 to +∞

Using euler's formula I got the result

F(w)=(2/π)0.5( eit(w-a)/i(w-a) - e-it(w+a)/i(w+a) )

I don't know what to do from here... I can't just substitute!
If anyone could point me in the right direction I'd appreciate!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need a common denominator don't you?
If I understand you correctly - you converted the cosine in the integral into a sum of exponentials, then did the integration?

That would give you something like:
$$e^{-at}\cos(wt)=\frac{1}{2} e^{-at}\left ( e^{iwt}+e^{-iwt} \right ) = \frac{1}{2}\left (e^{(iw-a)t}+e^{-(iw+a)t}\right )$$ ...in the integrand - which does not look like it ends up looking like yours. Can you show the intermediate steps in your working?

Alternatively:
You could try using integration by parts instead (hint: twice).
 
Simon Bridge said:
You need a common denominator don't you?
If I understand you correctly - you converted the cosine in the integral into a sum of exponentials, then did the integration?

That would give you something like:
$$e^{-at}\cos(wt)=\frac{1}{2} e^{-at}\left ( e^{iwt}+e^{-iwt} \right ) = \frac{1}{2}\left (e^{(iw-a)t}+e^{-(iw+a)t}\right )$$ ...in the integrand - which does not look like it ends up looking like yours. Can you show the intermediate steps in your working?

Alternatively:
You could try using integration by parts instead (hint: twice).

You're correct. I made a mistake! The actual result is:

[itex]{\frac{1}{2\sqrt{2π}}\left[\frac{exp(t(iw-a))}{iw-a}-\frac{exp(-t(iw+a))}{iw+a}\right]}[/itex]

The problem remains tho... I don't know what to do from here, since I'm integrating from 0 to ∞ !
 
Applying the limits - ##t=0## case is easy. It is ##t\rightarrow \infty## in the first term that gives you the problem?

To procede from here you need to convert the exponentials back into cosine and sine functions ... think in terms of a product of and exponential and trig functions.

I still think it is easier to just follow the hint in post #2.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Applying the limits - ##t=0## case is easy. It is ##t\rightarrow \infty## in the first term that gives you the problem?

To procede from here you need to convert the exponentials back into cosine and sine functions ... think in terms of a product of and exponential and trig functions.

I still think it is easier to just follow the hint in post #2.

I tought about using your hint, but I'd end up with cosine and sine functions, and neither of them converge to a value as x goes to infinity! That's why I avoided using it!
 
Jalo said:
I tought about using your hint, but I'd end up with cosine and sine functions, and neither of them converge to a value as x goes to infinity! That's why I avoided using it!

I think there is probably an unstated assumption that a>0. So your trig functions don't converge but they are bounded. e^(-at) goes to zero as t->infinity. What happens?
 
Thanks Dick - yes: that would be a problem if the trig functions were not multiplied by a decreasing exponential.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K