What is the current consensus on 7Li abundances and key research papers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kea
  • Start date Start date
Kea
Messages
859
Reaction score
0
To the experts

What are a couple of recommended papers on 7Li abundances? I have had a quick look at Steigman, and he seems to conclude that the problem might well be in the nuclear physics. What is the current consensus?

Cheers
Kea :smile:
 
Space news on Phys.org
Chronos said:
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0603817
Inhomogeneous Big Bang Nucleosynthesis Revisited

Thanks, Chronos. This paper seems to get 7Li concordance (for WMAP3) with a "depletion factor for stellar processes". That doesn't sound very convincing to me...unless we expect a large depletion factor to arise this way?

:smile:
 
Yep, it wasn't terribly convincing to me either Kea. Hence, 'speculative' remains the word of the day. It also doesn't appear a huge number of people are clammoring for collider/telescope time to resolve this mystery. Since I have too much free time, I will attempt to explore this a bit deeper if desired.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top