What is the derivation of the second equation for area velocity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shreya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Velocity
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the derivation of the second equation for area velocity, building on an understanding of the first equation. The area swept out by a particle in time δt is approximated using the cross-product of position and velocity vectors, leading to the first formula. For the second equation, the discussion explores calculating the area in both Cartesian and polar coordinates, emphasizing the relationship between the radius and angular velocity. The participants confirm that the derived expression for the area velocity is correct. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding vector relationships in deriving these equations.
Shreya
Messages
187
Reaction score
64
Homework Statement
I want to understand the second equation for Areal velocity as given below.
Relevant Equations
Refer below.
Screenshot from 2023-01-19 20-29-43.png
Screenshot from 2023-01-19 20-30-05.png

I think I understand how the first equation comes about.

Screenshot from 2023-01-19 20-43-16.png

In ##dt## the particle travels by ##dr##, I considered it as a triangle with altitude ##r## and base ##dr##. On dividing the area travelled in ##dt## by ##dt## we get the above equation.
A similar argument can be applied to ##\frac 1 2 \rho^2 \frac {d\phi} {dt}## as ##\rho## is same as r and ##\rho \frac {d\phi} {dt}## is same as ##\frac {dr} {dt}##

But, I am not able to understand the 2nd equation. I can provide a similar argument for ##xv_y## but can,t seem to reason any further.
Please be kind to help.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot from 2023-01-19 20-39-16.png
    Screenshot from 2023-01-19 20-39-16.png
    3.8 KB · Views: 139
Physics news on Phys.org
The unsigned area swept out in time \delta t is approximately |\delta S| \approx \tfrac12 <br /> \|\mathbf{r} \times (\mathbf{r} + \mathbf{v}\delta t)\| = <br /> \tfrac12 \|\mathbf{r} \times \mathbf{v}\| |\delta t|. This is because the magnitude of the cross-product gives the area of the parallelogram bounded by \mathbf{r} and \mathbf{r} + \mathbf{v} \delta t, and the area swept out is approximately the area of a triangle which is one half of the parallelogram. Dividing by \delta t and taking the limit \delta t \to 0 gives <br /> \left|\frac{dS}{dt}\right| = \tfrac12 \|\mathbf{r} \times \mathbf{v}\|. This is essentially the derivation of the first formula.

To derive the second, in the case of motion in the (x,y,0) plane we can calculate \frac12\|\mathbf{r} \times \mathbf{v}\| either in cartesians or in plane polars using the standard formulae \begin{split}<br /> \mathbf{r} &amp;= r\mathbf{e}_r(\theta) \\<br /> \mathbf{v} &amp;= \dot r \mathbf{e}_r(\theta) + r\dot \theta \mathbf{e}_{\theta}(\theta) \end{split} where <br /> \mathbf{e}_r(\theta) \times \mathbf{e}_\theta(\theta) \equiv \mathbf{e}_z. We can then adopt the convention that S increases in the direction of increasing \theta to remove the absolute value signs.
 
pasmith said:
To derive the second, in the case of motion in the (x,y,0) plane we can calculate 12‖r×v‖ either in cartesians or in plane polars using the standard formulae r=rer(θ)v=r˙er(θ)+rθ˙eθ(θ) where er(θ)×eθ(θ)≡ez. We can then adopt the convention that S increases in the direction of increasing θ to remove the absolute value signs.
Thank You so much @pasmith !
##\vec r = x \hat i + y \hat j##
##\vec v = v_x \hat i + v_y \hat j##

##\vec r \times \vec v = (x v_y - y v_x) \hat k##
##\frac {dS} {dt} = \frac 1 2 (xv_y-yv_x)##
Is the above right?
 
Yes, the above is right
 
If have close pipe system with water inside pressurized at P1= 200 000Pa absolute, density 1000kg/m3, wider pipe diameter=2cm, contraction pipe diameter=1.49cm, that is contraction area ratio A1/A2=1.8 a) If water is stationary(pump OFF) and if I drill a hole anywhere at pipe, water will leak out, because pressure(200kPa) inside is higher than atmospheric pressure (101 325Pa). b)If I turn on pump and water start flowing with with v1=10m/s in A1 wider section, from Bernoulli equation I...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
855
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K