What is the difference between a waveguide/horn and regular metal pipes?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the differences between waveguides/horns and regular metal pipes, particularly in the context of microwave transmission. Participants explore the technical, manufacturing, and economic aspects of these components, questioning why commercial waveguides are priced significantly higher than standard metal pipes.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that while any copper pipe can transmit waves, rectangular waveguides have advantages such as supporting a single mode, which is beneficial for high bandwidth transmission.
  • Others argue that ordinary pipe bends are problematic due to the need for specific bending radii and tuning mechanisms to minimize reflections.
  • One participant notes that while it is possible to create microwave components from metal sheets or pipes, the performance may not match that of commercial waveguides due to issues like surface resistance and dielectric losses.
  • Concerns are raised about the material properties of metals used in waveguides, such as oxidation and reactivity, which can affect performance over time.
  • Historical context is provided, mentioning early experiments with waveguides using round copper pipes, which faced issues with mode mixing and polarization.
  • Precision in manufacturing is emphasized, with some participants questioning whether regular metal pieces can truly match the geometrical tolerances required for effective waveguides and horns.
  • Cost factors are discussed, including the expenses related to engineering, precision machining, and quality assurance measurements that contribute to the high prices of commercial components.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility and performance of using standard metal pipes versus specialized waveguides. There is no consensus on whether the differences in performance justify the cost of commercial waveguides.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential variations in geometrical precision, material properties, and the specific requirements for microwave transmission that may not be met by standard metal pipes.

BlackPowder
Messages
14
Reaction score
2
What is the difference between those horns/waveguides and regular metal pieces with a same geometry? Why the microwave companies sell those parts at hundreds and thousands dollars? Why we cannot buy some metal sheets or pipes on McMaster-Carr with very low price and make some microwave components by ourselves?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There is quite a lot of black magic talked about with waveguides, because the waves will go through any old copper pipe. However, a rectangular WG has the advantage that there is only one mode, so it avoids multiple signals which can be a problem for high bandwidth transmission of data or TV. It is also difficult to use ordinary pipe bends because a "proper" waveguide will have carefully chosen bending radius and will often have tuning screws to reduce unwanted reflections. I cannot see any problem in principle about using circular tubing, although more modes may spring up and polarisation may rotate due to imperfections. One issue is that it is hard to make WG to coax transitions, so that is why peope buy them and then stick to standard sizes. Incidentally, for 50 years it has been the practice for microwave links to use corrugated elliptical waveguide, which can to some extent be bent like a cable.
 
BlackPowder said:
Why we cannot buy some metal sheets or pipes on McMaster-Carr with very low price and make some microwave components by ourselves?
We can and some do.

Losses in a waveguide are less than in coaxial cable because there is no dielectric. Losses in the waveguide are therefore due to the internal surface resistance. That suggests cheap aluminium or expensive copper tube, or a silver or gold plated base metal. But reactive metals gradually develop a surface film that becomes a lossy dielectric, which may also absorb water. Surface protective films are also lossy dielectrics at GHz frequencies. Filling the guide with dry nitrogen is sometimes used, but that is expensive and requires a seal or dielectric window at each end.

Aluminium is chemically too reactive, copper oxidises with losses gradually increasing over time, gold plating is more lossy than copper in the short term, but losses with gold do not increase with time, silver plating is usually a good compromise.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and Klystron
The first demonstrations of microwave transmission through waveguides were performed around 1930 by G. C. Southworth. He used round copper rain downspouts one mile long visible in the photo below.

George_Southworth_%26_waveguides.jpg

Southworth at Bell Labs in 1943 standing in front of experimental waveguide line he used in his original research into waveguides during the 1930s. (Wikipeadia)

As tech99 pointed out, however, round waveguides mix modes and polarizations, as do imperfections in rectangular guides. It's also true that pipe joints give poor electrical performance unless they are carefully soldered or welded. Commercial waveguides, on the other hand, have flanges with built-in quarter wave chokes that provide nearly lossless performance in a bolt-together joint.
1571975209365.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: Klystron, dlgoff and berkeman
BlackPowder said:
What is the difference between those horns/waveguides and regular metal pieces with a same geometry?

At some fundamental level I suppose there isn't a huge difference but I would question if those pieces of metal are actually the same geometry. Precision matters. Horns and waveguides are manufactured to very tight tolerances and that is not cheap.

BlackPowder said:
Why the microwave companies sell those parts at hundreds and thousands dollars?

Let's consider some of the costs to the manufacturer. Many geometries are possible. After all pieces of metal come in many shapes and sizes. Someone has to pay an engineer to determine what geometry will solve the particular problem at hand and that costs money. The precision machining mentioned above costs money. And, very important and often left out, someone has to go an do the measurements that the design and particular part you will be sold meets the specification. Those measurements are often very expensive.

If the part is unique or exotic in some way there will not be many of them to amortize the costs over hence the high price. This is very typical as one gets away from the main stream, almost by definition.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Klystron

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
19K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
43K