What is the Difference Between Average Velocity and Instantaneous Velocity?

AI Thread Summary
Average velocity is calculated as the total distance traveled divided by the total time taken over a specific interval. In contrast, instantaneous velocity refers to the speed and direction of an object at a specific moment, akin to what a speedometer displays. On a displacement-vs-time graph, average velocity is represented by the slope of a line segment connecting two points, while instantaneous velocity is depicted by the slope of the tangent line at a particular point. Understanding these definitions helps clarify the distinction between the two concepts. Overall, average velocity applies to intervals, whereas instantaneous velocity pertains to specific moments in time.
EngTechno
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
can you explain me Instantaneous Velocity in simplest form?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The average velocity over a time interval is the distance traveled divided by the time interval. The instantaneous velocity is the limiting case, where the time interval approaches zero.
 
Instantaneous velocity can be thought of as "[the vector quantity with magnitude] what your speedometer reads right now, together with the direction your car is pointing".

On a displacement-vs-time graph, you can visualize krab's definitions as
  • average-velocity="the slope of a line-segment with endpoints at the start and end of the time-interval of interest"
  • instantaneous-velocity="the slope of the tangent-line at the instant of interest"

It's good to remember these prepositional phrases
  • average-velocity over a specific time-interval (you need to specify two times [better: two events])
  • instantaneous-velocity at a specific instant (you need to specify one time [better: one event])
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top