What is the difference between E(Y|X) and E(Y|X=x) in linear regression models?

AI Thread Summary
In linear regression, E(Y|X) represents the expected value of Y given a random variable X, while E(Y|X=x) refers to the expected value of Y given a fixed value of X. The distinction between random and fixed X depends on the context; for instance, age can be fixed when measuring a specific group of children, or random when sampling from a larger population. The notation E(Y) can sometimes be used interchangeably with E(Y|X) when X is random, but it does not imply independence between X and Y. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately interpreting regression models and their implications.
kingwinner
Messages
1,266
Reaction score
0
1) "In regression models, there are two types of variables:
X = independent variable
Y = dependent variable
Y is modeled as random.
X is sometimes modeled as random and sometimes it has fixed value for each observation."


I don't understand the meaning of the last line. When is X random? When is X fixed? Can anyone illustrate each case with a quick example?


2) "Simple linear regression model: Y = β0 + β1X + ε
If X is random, E(Y|X) = β0 + β1X
If X is fixed, E(Y|X=x) = β0 + β1x"


Now what's the difference between E(Y|X) and E(Y|X=x)? The above is suuposed to be dealing with 2 separate cases (X random and X fixed), but I don't see any difference...
Most of the time, I am seeing E(Y) = β0 + β1X instead, how come? This is inconsistent with the above. E(Y) is not the same as E(Y|X=x) and I don't think they can ever be equal.

Thanks for explaining!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In many cases the question whether X is random is theoretical. A clear-cut case for nonrandom X is the time trend (e.g., seconds into the experiment, or years into the Obama administration, etc.). Two clear cases of random X is (a) when X is co-determined with Y; and (b) when X is measured with random error.

E(Y|X) implies that the random variable X is not assumed to take on a particular value; E(Y|X=x) implies X is assumed to equal the predetermined, nonrandom value x. E[Y] is being used as a shorthand for "E[Y|X] if X is random, E[Y|x] otherwise."
 
For example, if we have height v.s. age (Y v.s. X), is X fixed or random?

Also, what does it mean for X to be FIXED? If we have five data points, x1,x2...,x5, and NOT all of them have the same value of X (e.g. x1≠x2), is X fixed in this case?

Thank you!
 
"Fixed vs. random" usually depends on your goal. In your example, height vs. age, there may be at least two different contexts:

1. Heights of 10 children are measured at ages 1 through 10. We would like to determine the relationship between height and age for these 10 children.

2. 100 children are selected at random from a population of 10,000; their ages are recorded and their heights are measured. We would like to determine a general relationship between height and age for the entire population, based on this sample.

In case 1, age is fixed. In case 2, it is random.
 
Enuma_Elish said:
"Fixed vs. random" usually depends on your goal. In your example, height vs. age, there may be at least two different contexts:

1. Heights of 10 children are measured at ages 1 through 10. We would like to determine the relationship between height and age for these 10 children.

2. 100 children are selected at random from a population of 10,000; their ages are recorded and their heights are measured. We would like to determine a general relationship between height and age for the entire population, based on this sample.

In case 1, age is fixed. In case 2, it is random.
Thanks for the concrete examples. Things make a lot more sense now!
 
2) By definitions,
E(Y)=

∫ y f(y) dy
-∞

E(Y|X)=

∫ y f(y|x) dy
-∞

If X is FIXED, does this ALWAYS imply that X and Y are INDEPENDENT and E(Y)=E(Y|X=x)?? Why or why not?

For simple linear regression model, my textbook typically write
Y= β0 + β1*X + ε as
E(Y) = β0 + β1*X

However, I have seen occasionally that
Y= β0 + β1*X + ε is written as
E(Y|X) = β0 + β1*X which looks a bit inconsistent to the above...how come? The definitions of E(Y) and E(Y|X) are clearly different as I outlined above, but here it seems like they are equal? How come?

Thanks for explaining!
 
Last edited:
E(Y) (using shorthand notation) is a function of X: E(Y) = b0 + b1 X. That means E(Y) is never indep. of X; the question is whether it's a dependence on a nonrandom variable ("x"), or a random variable ("X"). As I explained above, E(Y) is a shorthand notation.
 
In their Econometric Foundations, Mittelhammer, Judge & Miller hold "E[Y] = E[Y|X] whenever X = x," (i.e. always). [Not an exact quotation.]
 
Last edited:
Back
Top