What Is the Difference Between Symbolic and Literal Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter barryj
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A symbolic equation represents a general mathematical relationship using variables, such as d = vt, without specific values assigned. In contrast, a literal equation involves substituting numerical values for those variables, exemplified by d = 10m/sec * 5 seconds. The distinction lies in the level of specificity, with symbolic equations remaining abstract and literal equations providing concrete evaluations. Understanding this difference is crucial for applying mathematical concepts effectively. Overall, symbolic equations convey relationships, while literal equations demonstrate specific instances of those relationships.
barryj
Messages
856
Reaction score
51
Can someone tell me the difference, if there is any, between a symboliuc equation and a literal equation.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Only if you can define your terms 'symbolic equation' and 'literal equation' more exactly.
 
Well, this is basically what I am asking. Is a symbolic equation one that has not terms defined like d = vt while a literal equation is one where you insert the values for the symbols, like d = 10m/.sec * 5 seconds?
 
barryj said:
Well, this is basically what I am asking. Is a symbolic equation one that has not terms defined like d = vt while a literal equation is one where you insert the values for the symbols, like d = 10m/.sec * 5 seconds?

One expresses a general mathematical relationship between several different quantities, the other is just an evaluation of that mathematical relationship by plugging in numerical values for each of the variables.
 

Thread 'Non-orthogonal bases'

Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
View full post »

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Similar threads

B The difference between the symbols ##=## and ##\equiv##
Replies
6
Views
1K
B English Translation of Italian Lecture Notes: Equations & Solutions
Replies
11
Views
1K
I Solving a System of Nonlinear Equations Symbolically
Replies
9
Views
2K
I Arithmetic representation of symbols according to certain rules
Replies
35
Views
3K
I Solve Brainteaser: What's the Difference in Age Between Steve and Steveston?
Replies
20
Views
2K
B Parabola and Hyperbola Question
Replies
31
Views
6K
MHB How Does Boyle's Law Explain the Pressure-Volume Relationship of CO2?
Replies
3
Views
3K
I Math Myth: The rationals are numbers
3
Replies
142
Views
9K
B What Does $L^{-1} Indicate in Pricing?
Replies
3
Views
1K
MHB What are some questions about thermodynamics and their potential answers?
Replies
3
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top