What is the Directional Derivative at a Given Point?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jegues
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivatives
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the directional derivative of a function at a specific point, focusing on the concept of directionality in a three-dimensional space. Participants are exploring the implications of direction vectors and their normalization in the context of the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to define the direction of the line formed by the intersection of two planes and is seeking clarity on determining the direction of increasing x. Other participants provide examples and discuss the significance of choosing the correct direction vector, including the need for unit vectors.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering guidance on identifying direction vectors and their normalization. There is a recognition of the need to clarify the distinction between the direction of the line and the vector from the origin to a point on the line. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly regarding the correct approach to defining the directional derivative.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the assumptions related to the direction of increasing x and the implications of the chosen parameterization of the line. Participants are also considering the scalar nature of the final answer for the directional derivative.

jegues
Messages
1,085
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


See first figure.


Homework Equations


N/A


The Attempt at a Solution



See second figure. I defined direction of the line by which the two planes intersect as,

[tex]\vec{d}[/tex]

and found that the point they are asking about is when,

[tex]t=1[/tex]

and I'm stuck here. This is my first attempt at a question like this so I applogize in advance if I'm missing something obvious.

How do I figure out what direction is the direction of increasing x?

[tex]D_{u^{+}}f(x,y,z) = f_{x}(x,y,z)a + f_{y}(x,y,z)b + f_{z}(x,y,z)c[/tex]

So,

[tex]D_{u^{+}}f(x,y,z) = ax^{2} + b2y -c2z[/tex]

At the point (-1,1,3),

[tex]D_{u^{+}}f(-1,1,3) = a + 2b -6c[/tex]

This is as far as I got.

Any suggestions?
 

Attachments

  • DIRDERIV.JPG
    DIRDERIV.JPG
    17.1 KB · Views: 419
  • DIRATT.JPG
    DIRATT.JPG
    39.7 KB · Views: 412
Physics news on Phys.org
To take a simpler example: If you have the function f(x,y)=x2+y2, and I told you to take the directional derivative along the line y=x...

The obvious vector to take is the vector (1,1) (scaled to be a unit vector). But that's not the only direction you could pick, (-1,-1) also is a vector pointing along the line y=x. If I addeed: take the direction of increasing x, then you would want to pick the vector that points along the direction in which x increases. This means that the vector pointing in the direction of the line has a positive x coordinate, so the right direction would be (1,1)
 
Office_Shredder said:
To take a simpler example: If you have the function f(x,y)=x2+y2, and I told you to take the directional derivative along the line y=x...

The obvious vector to take is the vector (1,1) (scaled to be a unit vector). But that's not the only direction you could pick, (-1,-1) also is a vector pointing along the line y=x. If I addeed: take the direction of increasing x, then you would want to pick the vector that points along the direction in which x increases. This means that the vector pointing in the direction of the line has a positive x coordinate, so the right direction would be (1,1)


Okay so the line I'm given is as follows,

[tex]\vec{l} = <0, -1, 2> + <-1,2,1>t[/tex]

and for x to increase along the line l,

[tex]t \leq -1[/tex].

so if I simply compute t = -1, I'll get a vector with the direction,

[tex]\vec{u} = <1,-3,1>[/tex]

Scaling this to be a unit vector,

[tex]\hat{u} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{11}}<1,-3,1>[/tex]

Would this be a vector of magnitude 1 pointing in the direction of increasing x?
 
Bump, still looking for some help on this one.
 
Bumpity bump!
 
jegues said:
Okay so the line I'm given is as follows,

[tex]\vec{l} = <0, -1, 2> + <-1,2,1>t[/tex]

and for x to increase along the line l,

[tex]t \leq -1[/tex].

so if I simply compute t = -1, I'll get a vector with the direction,

[tex]\vec{u} = <1,-3,1>[/tex]

That's not right. Your [tex]\vec{u}[/tex] is the vector from the origin to the point (1, -3, 1) on line l where t = -1. You want the direction of your line itself for which x is increasing. So you should just have [tex]\vec{u} = <1, -2, -1>.[/tex] Make that into a unit vector and finish up.
 
Raskolnikov said:
That's not right. Your [tex]\vec{u}[/tex] is the vector from the origin to the point (1, -3, 1) on line l where t = -1. You want the direction of your line itself for which x is increasing. So you should just have [tex]\vec{u} = <1, -2, -1>.[/tex] Make that into a unit vector and finish up.


Okay so scaling it as a unit vector,

[tex]\hat{u} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{6}} < 1, -2, -1>[/tex]

Now how can I use this to solve for a, b and c? That's what I want to do next right?
 
No...that's what you just found. [tex]\vec{u} = <a, b, c>[/tex]
 
Raskolnikov said:
No...that's what you just found. [tex]\vec{u} = <a, b, c>[/tex]

Oh okay! I think I get it now.

Thanks again.
 
  • #10
Sorry for ressurecting this thread, but I've got another quick question.

When someone asks me for the directional derivative of something at a given point, is my final answer a scalar?

In this case would it simply be the scalar provided by,

[tex]\nabla f(-1,1,3)\cdot \hat{u}[/tex]

?

Thanks again!
 
  • #11
Yes, it's the scalar product of the gradient and a unit vector.
[tex] D_{u}f= \nabla f\cdot\frac{\bold{u}}{\left|\bold{u}\right|}[/tex]
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K