What is the efficiency of a solar collector made of an aluminium canister?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the efficiency of an aluminum canister designed as a solar collector for a physics coursework investigation. The setup involves a 40W light bulb positioned 5cm from the canister, which is painted black and insulated on one side. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the useful power output, which is likely heat, and the total power input to determine efficiency. A formula is provided: efficiency equals useful power output divided by total power input. The conversation highlights the need for specific questions rather than general requests for step-by-step guidance.
johnboy11
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

As part of my A2 physics coursework investigation, i want to calculate the efficiency of an aluminium canister modeled as a solar collector.

The basic set up of the apparatus is:

- Lamp (40W light bulb) at a fixed distance of 5cm away from the aluminium canister (which is painted black, and the half of the canister not being penetrated by light is covered with insulating material - carpetty)

What measurements need to be taken? Can you provide me with a step-by-step guide of how to calculate the efficiency with equations.

Thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You want a step by step guide of how to do your coursework with equations?

How about reading your recommended text and talking to your teacher?
 
No its not actually my coursework investigation, and isn't really required, but i want to do this anyway...

Its not in the textbooks, nor the A2 syllabus, but it shows that i have researched, which i have...
 
No-one's going to give you a step by step guide of how to do an experiment. Ask a specific question about something you're unable to grasp.

Efficiency = useful power output / total power input

What is your useful output? Heat?
 
Last edited:
A common calculation related to the intensity of a light source is to figure that a detector gathers some of the source's energy on a particular surface area, and that area is a known fraction of the area of an imaginary sphere surrounding the source and capturing all of its energy. A common astronomy exercise is: a detector orbiting the Earth measures electromagnetic radiation from the sun to be 1370 watts per square meter, now, using a reference table to obtain the distance from the Earth to the sun, imagining the sun to be enclosed by a sphere whose radius is the sun-earth distance, we can determine that the sun puts a total of 3.8 X 10^26 watts.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top