What is the Efficiency of a Stirling Engine Between Two Heat Baths?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving an expression for the efficiency of a Stirling engine operating between two heat baths at temperatures T1 and T2, with a focus on the working substance being a monatomic ideal gas.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants present various expressions for the heat absorbed (Q1) and heat lost (Q2) during the Stirling cycle, questioning the correctness of their formulations and seeking clarification on definitions.

Discussion Status

Multiple expressions for Q1 and Q2 have been shared, with participants comparing their results and discussing the implications of their assumptions regarding temperature designations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationships between the heat quantities and the efficiency expression.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the correctness of their derived expressions and the definitions of heat absorbed and lost, indicating a need for clarification on these concepts within the context of the Stirling engine cycle.

aurora14421
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Derive an expression for the effiency of the cycle (of a Stirling Engine) working between two heat baths at temperatures T1 and T2 with volumes in the ratio V2/V1. Assume the working substance is a monatomic ideal gas.

Homework Equations



Work done=heat absorbed from going from V1 to V2 at constant temperature and is given by:

RT ln(V2/V1)

Heat absorbed in going from T1 to T2 is:

(3/2)R(T2-T1)

efficiency=1-Q2/Q1 where Q2 is the heat lost per cycle and Q1 is the heat gained per cycle.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have an expression but I have no idea if it was correct. I tried to google what the correct efficiency should be but I couldn't find it. My expression is:

\eta = \frac{(T_2-T_1) (ln(V_2/V_1)+3)}{T_2 ln(V_2/V_1) +1.5(T_2-T_1)}

I don't think it's right, it looks a bit messy. If someone could tell me if it's correct or not that would be a great help. It would be an even greater help if someone could tell me where I have gone wrong or give me the correct expression so I can work out how to derive it.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I get a similar, but not identical, expression.

What did you get for Q1 and Q2?
 
I had, Q1, the heat absorbed, is:

R T_2 ln(V_2/V_1) + 1.5R(T_2-T_1)

And Q2, the heat lost, is:

R T_1 ln(V_2/V_1) + 1.5R(T_1-T_2)
 
I got, for the final term in Q2, 1.5R(T2 - T1)

But we should clarify something: are you, like me, using T2 for the hot temperature and T1 for the cold temperature?
 
aurora14421 said:
I had, Q1, the heat absorbed, is:

R T_2 ln(V_2/V_1) + 1.5R(T_2-T_1)

And Q2, the heat lost, is:

R T_1 ln(V_2/V_1) + 1.5R(T_1-T_2)
The heat lost at constant temperature in the compression part of the cycle (V2 to V1) is equal to the work done on the gas (per mole) (dU = 0) :

\int_{V_2}^{V_1} PdV = RT_1\int_{V_2}^{V_1}dV/V = RT_1\ln{(V_1/V_2)}

The heat gained at constant temperature in the expansion part of the cycle (V1 to V2) is equal to the work done by the gas (per mole) (dU = 0) :

\int_{V_1}^{V_2} PdV = RT_2\int_{V_1}^{V_2}dV/V = RT_2\ln{(V_2/V_1)} = - RT_2\ln{(V_1/V_2)}

Therefore:

|Q_h| = C_v(T_2-T_1) + RT_2\ln{(V_2/V_1)} and

|Q_c| = C_v(T_2-T_1) + RT_1\ln{(V_2/V_1)}

So plug that into:

\eta = W/Q_h = (Q_h-Q_c)/Q_h

I get:

\eta = \frac{R\ln{(V_2/V_1)}(T_2-T_1)}{C_v(T_2-T_1) + RT_2\ln{(V_2/V_1)}}

For a monatomic gas:

\eta = \frac{2\ln{(V_2/V_1)}(T_2-T_1)}{3(T_2-T_1) + 2T_2\ln{(V_2/V_1)}}

AM
 
Last edited:
Thank you very much for all your help. Got it now.
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K