What Is the Equation for Magnetic Energy in an External Field?

AI Thread Summary
The total free energy of a system in an external magnetic field H is expressed as F= 0.5 * χe^(-1) * Me^2 + 0.5 * χl^(-1) * Ml^2 - Jeff*Ml*Me - (Ml+Me)H, where Ml and Me represent magnetizations of local moments and electrons, respectively. The discussion highlights confusion about the derivation of this expression, particularly regarding the first two terms and the absence of mu_zero. Participants emphasize the distinction between free energy and internal energy, suggesting the need for a deeper understanding of statistical mechanics. A link to the relevant paper is provided for further reference. Overall, the conversation seeks clarification on the equation's origins and its modeling implications.
Otterhoofd
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I was reading an article, and it said that the total free energy of the system in an external magnetic field H can be written as:
F= 0.5 * χe^(-1) * Me^2 + 0.5 * χl^(-1) * Ml^2 - Jeff*Ml*Me - (Ml+Me)H

Where Ml and Me denote the magnetization for the local moment and electron subsystem. J_eff is the magnetic exchange coupling between them. H is the applied field and χl and χe the susceptibilty of the system (local moment/electrons)

I don't understand where this expression comes from. I start out with U=-M*B, but I cannot seem to get to the right answer. The first two terms of the right hand site of the equation from the paper are mysterious to me, and I would expect a mu_zero to show up somewhere.
Can anybody please give it a try? It shouldn't be that hard I would say. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have a link to the paper?
 
Agreed, could we obtain more details about what it specifically models, and a link to the paper? I just took a statistical mechanics course, and deriving results like this can be pretty trying in fact, at least to me they were. Specifically, I remember the course covering topics related to the free energy of a system subject to an external H-field. I am not competent enough in it to give you a more thorough answer though off-hand, I will have to consult K. Huang's text and my notes from the course. In the mean time, how about giving us a peak at that paper?

Recall though that the free energy dF = dU - TdS - SdT (or, however you wish to manipulate it), there are more terms included other than the internal energy U. You may have been pursuing this route, but I thought I would point out that free energy is not the same thing as internal energy (U), on the off-chance that you made this oversight.
 
Link to the paper:
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/329/5987/61

Quantized Anomalous Hall Effect in Magnetic Topological Insulators by R.Yu et al.

Thanks for the replies so far!
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top