What Is the Equilibrium Constant for This Reaction?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the equilibrium constant (Kc) for the reaction CO2 + H2 <-> CO + H2O, given specific initial concentrations in a 2.0 L container. The calculated Kc value of 2.011 was found to be close to the expected value of 2.06, indicating a minor arithmetic error. Participants suggest recalculating the concentrations and checking the stoichiometric relationships to identify any mistakes. It is emphasized that small errors in calculations typically do not significantly impact exam scores. The final equilibrium concentration for CO is noted to be 0.046 M.
Raul3140
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Equilibrium constant question?

Homework Statement


A mixture of 0.229 mol CO2, 0.229 mol of H2, and 0.328 mol of H2O are placed in a 2.0 L container. The following equilibrium is established:
CO2 + H2 <-> CO + H2O. The equilibrium concentration of H2O is 0.210 M. Calculate the equilibrium constant (Kc)


Homework Equations



Kc=Products/reactants...raised to their stochiometric coefficients.



The Attempt at a Solution



I keep getting 2.011 I used the stochiometric relationship to determine the changes in concentration.

The answer is supposed to be 2.06
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I got 2.06 , or 2.0587 to be exact.

If you are that close you have probably not made any great mistake of principle.

Have you carried through the arithmetic to full precision at each stage?

Your equilibrium [CO2] and [H2] are equal? (0.0685 M)

One thing you may find profitable is instead of going through your work, you totally recalculate without looking at it. It goes a lot faster this time which boosts confidence. But perhaps you have already done that.
If there is a small arithmetical error only it will lose you very few marks if any in most sensible exams etc.

Checking whether your equilibrium [H2] + [H2O] adds up to the initial sum as it should, and similarly for the other pair might localise any error.
[CO] = 0.046 M
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top