What is the final speed and direction of the first puck after collision?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physics(L)10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a collision between two hockey pucks, focusing on the final speed and direction of the first puck after the collision. The context includes concepts from momentum conservation and vector components in a two-dimensional space.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the conservation of momentum in both x and y directions, questioning the assumptions about the pucks sticking together and the treatment of angles in the calculations. There are attempts to express momentum equations and clarify the components involved.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, sharing their attempts and questioning each other's reasoning. Some guidance has been provided regarding the need to consider vertical components separately and the implications of angles in momentum calculations. There is no explicit consensus yet on the final speed or direction.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion regarding the treatment of angles and the assumption of the pucks' interaction, indicating a need for clarification on these points. The problem constraints include the masses of the pucks and their initial velocities, but the final velocities remain to be determined.

physics(L)10
Messages
101
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A .5kg hockey puck moving at 2 m/sec strikes another puck with a mass of 1kg. The puck then travels at an angle of 60 degrees with a speed of .75m/sec with respect to the motion of the original puck.

a) What is the final speed of the first puck?
b) What is the final direction of the first puck?

m1=.5kg
m2=1kg
v1=?
v2=.75 m/sec

Homework Equations


p=mv
ΔP1 + ΔP2 = (F1 + F2)(Δt)


The Attempt at a Solution



m1u1 = (m1+m2)v cos60
m2u2 = (m1+m2)v sin60

This is all I can get. I think I'm right so far lol. I need help badly! This momentum stuff is killing me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
physics(L)10 said:

The Attempt at a Solution



m1u1 = (m1+m2)v cos60
m2u2 = (m1+m2)v sin60

This is all I can get. I think I'm right so far lol. I need help badly! This momentum stuff is killing me.

right, so the initial x-direction momentum is m1u1, the initial y-direction momentum is?

But they did not say the masses stick together, so you cannot assume that. Instead assume mass 1's final velocity is v1 (vx1 and vy1 components) and mass 2's is v2, they said v2 is 0.75 m/s at 60°.

So what is the final x-direction momentum and y-direction momentum?
 
Well I've been working on this question and this is what I came up with. Please take the time to read it and give your input. Thank you very much :):)

m1=.5kg
m2=1kg
v1I=2 m/sec
v2I=0 m/sec
v2F=.75 m/sec

P=mvcos
=(1)(.75)
=.75 kgm/sec

PTotal=m1v1I+m2v2I
PTotal=m1v1F+m2v2F

PTotal=(m1+m2)v
=(.5)(1)(2)
=1kgm/sec

PTotal=m1vF1+m2vF2
1=(.5)vF1 + (1)cos30
1=vF1 + 0.866
.134=vF1 = final speed
 
physics(L)10 said:
P=mvcos
=(1)(.75)
=.75 kgm/sec

Why did you neglect the angle?

physics(L)10 said:
PTotal=(m1+m2)v
=(.5)(1)(2)
=1kgm/sec

Your answer is correct, but why do you keep assuming that the masses stick together?

physics(L)10 said:
PTotal=m1vF1+m2vF2
1=(.5)vF1 + (1)cos30
1=vF1 + 0.866
.134=vF1 = final speed

You have another component to deal with, the vertical component.
 
rock.freak667 said:
Why did you neglect the angle?

Would the angle be 90 degrees which would make the whole thing 0?


rock.freak667 said:
Your answer is correct, but why do you keep assuming that the masses stick together?
I just don't know how to do it singly lol.


rock.freak667 said:
You have another component to deal with, the vertical component.
Alright I'll work on this
 
physics(L)10 said:
Would the angle be 90 degrees which would make the whole thing 0?

The question said at 60°

physics(L)10 said:
I just don't know how to do it singly lol.

Just write it out as single components

m1u1+m2u2=m1v1+m2v2


physics(L)10 said:
Alright I'll work on this

Remember consider the x and y directions separately at first.
 
ok i think i got it, hopefully lol:

p=mv

m1u1+m2u2=m1v1+m2v2cos60

(.5)(2)+(1)(0)=.5v1+(1)(.75)cos60

1=.5v1+.375

.625=.5v1

1.25=v1

b) The final direction would just be forward because the value of the speed is positive. Or do you use a formula to find the direction. I'm guessing you use v2=u2+2as, but we don't know acceleration unless it's the gravitational acceleration.

Thank you for any help you give :D
 
physics(L)10 said:
ok i think i got it, hopefully lol:

p=mv

m1u1+m2u2=m1v1+m2v2cos60

(.5)(2)+(1)(0)=.5v1+(1)(.75)cos60

1=.5v1+.375

.625=.5v1

1.25=v1

This gives you the horizontal component.

Remember you need to apply conservation of momentum vertically as well.

physics(L)10 said:
b) The final direction would just be forward because the value of the speed is positive. Or do you use a formula to find the direction. I'm guessing you use v2=u2+2as, but we don't know acceleration unless it's the gravitational acceleration.

When you get vx and vy for the puck, the direction is just the angle to the horizontal.
 
Would the vertical component be the same as the first equation except we would use sin60 instead of cos60?
 
  • #10
physics(L)10 said:
Would the vertical component be the same as the first equation except we would use sin60 instead of cos60?

Yes but your initial vertical momentum would be zero.
 
  • #11
Alright I got it, thanks a lot :D
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K