chow_dhury
- 4
- 4
- TL;DR
- Why is it called "condensed" matter physics?
What exactly is condensed here?
The discussion revolves around the concept of condensed matter physics, its definition, and its relationship to other fields such as fluid dynamics and physical chemistry. Participants explore the characteristics that define condensed matter physics, the historical context of its terminology, and how it overlaps with other scientific disciplines.
Participants do not reach a consensus on the definition of condensed matter physics, its relationship to fluid dynamics, or its overlap with physical chemistry. Multiple competing views remain throughout the discussion.
The discussion reveals limitations in definitions and the historical context of the terms used, indicating that boundaries between fields are often nebulous and subject to interpretation.
Doesn’t answer the question. Why condensed? What is condensed?Baluncore said:Welcome to PF.
The name "condensed matter physics" emphasized the commonality of scientific problems encountered by physicists working on solids, liquids, plasmas, and other complex matter, whereas "solid state physics" was often associated with restricted industrial applications of metals and semiconductors.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condensed_matter_physics#Etymology
Matter.chow_dhury said:Doesn’t answer the question. Why condensed? What is condensed?
There are forces between the molecules, so yes it is.Delta2 said:So say, fluid dynamics is part of condensed matter physics?
hm let us clarify something, condensed matter physics look what happens in the molecular/atomic level or they describe it macroscopically like for example with Navier-Stokes equations?Baluncore said:There are forces between the molecules, so yes it is.
I would say that it includes the macroscopic physical properties that influence flow, but not flow itself. It is not a well demarcated border.Delta2 said:hm let us clarify something, condensed matter physics look what happens in the molecular/atomic level or they describe it macroscopically like for example with Navier-Stokes equations?
So you saying that condensed matter physics can study properties like viscosity or density or pressure of a fluid but don't study how these properties influence the flow of a fluid?caz said:I would say that it includes the macroscopic physical properties that influence flow, but not flow itself. It is not a well demarcated border.
There is overlap, so it is a question of how one chooses to characterize the problem. It is not a clear boundary.Delta2 said:So you saying that condensed matter physics can study properties like viscosity or density or pressure of a fluid but don't study how these properties influence the flow of a fluid?
This is simply a matter of history, not of rigid definition. It's nebulous and you're going to have to be comfortable with that. Fluid mechanics developed into its own domain, with its own tradition, so if you take a course or read a book on "condensed matter" it's not going to cover it. Same with thermodynamics, skipped, even though concepts from thermo and statistical mechanics are required to understand a lot of condensed matter.Delta2 said:So you saying that condensed matter physics can study properties like viscosity or density or pressure of a fluid but don't study how these properties influence the flow of a fluid?
What does a typical course (or a typical book) on condensed matter covers? I am a mathematician and though there were many optional courses from the physics department during my undergraduate studies, I think I remember one with the name "Physics of Solid State" (direct translation from Greek) , -though I didn't take it- but none with Physics of Condensed matter.crashcat said:so if you take a course or read a book on "condensed matter"
I don't think so. The physical chemistry books I have don't cover the topics of condensed matter physics.Baluncore said:It seems to me that a physicist's "condensed matter", is a chemist's "physical chemistry".
Then you need to look at some other books. I agree, it is not a perfect 1:1 mapping.DrClaude said:The physical chemistry books I have don't cover the topics of condensed matter physics.
I see Chemical Physics in there, not physical chemistry (which is not the same thing).Baluncore said:Then you need to look at some other books. I agree, it is not a perfect 1:1 mapping.
Look at the Condensed Matter volume of the - Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology - Elsevier (2001)
That book is subtitled: "Thermodynamics and Kinetics". It is a textbook for a restricted syllabus course, not a survey of the greater Physical Chemistry field.DrClaude said:One of the most popular textbook in physical chemistry is Atkins'.